Every physics question lost on this paper, rebuilt in full. Each one carries what was given, what was asked, the concept behind it, the formula, the steps written out, a table justifying the right option and ruling out each of the others, the fastest route through, and an animated figure wherever seeing the thing settles the answer.
19Questions lost
13Attempted, wrong
6Left blank
89Marks at stake
The shape of this paper
Nineteen questions: thirteen attempted and missed, six left blank. On NEET marking that is
76 marks not gained plus 13 in negatives.
The attempt rate is high — over two-thirds — so hesitation is not the problem
here. Accuracy is. And the thirteen wrong answers are not thirteen separate gaps: most of them
come back to confusing potential with field, or to losing a sign when a quantity can
be negative.
All nineteen come from one chapter. Thirteen were attempted and missed against six left blank — a high attempt rate with low accuracy, and the errors cluster tightly around one distinction: potential against field.
Q 92Left blankDefinition of potential
The work done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinite distance to a point 'P' located at distance x from a positive charge Q is W. Then, the potential at that point 'P' is
WQ/x
CorrectW
W/x
WQ
Given
Work done bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to P is W.
Asked
The potential at P.
Concept to use
Potential is defined as the work done per unit charge in bringing a charge from infinity to that point. The question has already given you the work for a unit charge, so the division has effectively been done for you and the answer is W itself.
DiagramAnimatedPotential is work per unit charge — the division is already done.
Formula to useV = W/q ; with q = 1, V = W
Baby steps
V = W/q by definition.
Here q = 1 C, the unit charge.
So V = W/1 = W.
The Q and the x are there only as distractors — they are already baked into the value of W.
Answer
V = W
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
WQ/x
rule out
Multiplying by the source charge and dividing by the distance would be dimensionally wrong — W is already an energy per unit charge.
W
keep
Potential is work per unit charge, and the charge here is one unit.
W/x
rule out
Dividing by x again would double-count the distance dependence, which is already inside W.
WQ
rule out
Multiplying by Q would count the source charge twice.
Shortcut
Whenever a question says “unit positive charge”, the work quoted is the potential. The relationship V = W/q collapses to V = W, and any option containing Q or x is there to make you doubt it.
Q 93Attempted · wrongFinding q from E and V together
The electric field and electric potential at a point due to a point charge are 500 N C⁻¹ and 30 V respectively, then the magnitude of the charge is
Her answer1.3 × 10⁻⁹ C
3 × 10⁻¹² C
Correct2 × 10⁻¹⁰ C
1.6 × 10⁻²⁰ C
Given
E = 500 N C⁻¹ at the point.
V = 30 V at the same point.
Both are due to the same point charge.
Asked
The magnitude of the charge.
Concept to use
You have two equations and two unknowns (q and r). The elegant move is to divide V by E — the charge and the constant k both cancel, leaving the distance directly. Then substitute back into either equation.
DiagramAnimatedDivide V by E and the charge cancels, leaving the distance.
Formula to useE = kq/r² , V = kq/r → V/E = r
Baby steps
Divide: V/E = (kq/r) ÷ (kq/r²) = r.
r = 30/500 = 0.06 m.
Now use V = kq/r: q = Vr/k = (30 × 0.06)/(9 × 10⁹).
= 1.8 / (9 × 10⁹) = 2 × 10⁻¹⁰ C.
Answer
q = 2 × 10⁻¹⁰ C
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
1.3 × 10⁻⁹
rule out
About six times too large. It arises from using the wrong distance, or from using E rather than V in the final substitution.
3 × 10⁻¹²
rule out
Far too small — a factor of about 67 out.
2 × 10⁻¹⁰
keep
r = V/E = 0.06 m, then q = Vr/k.
1.6 × 10⁻²⁰
rule out
This is roughly the electronic charge squared — a number lifted from memory rather than calculated.
Shortcut
V/E = r is worth memorising outright. Any question giving you both the field and the potential at a point is really giving you the distance, and it takes one division. From there either formula finishes the job.
Where it went wrong
The answer came out roughly six times too big, which usually means the distance was wrong. If you substitute into E = kq/r² using r = 0.06 you get q = 2 × 10⁻¹⁰ too, so the formula choice was not the issue — the distance was. Getting r from V/E first, and writing it down, removes the guesswork.
Q 98Attempted · wrongWork against a uniform field
An energy of 10 J is required to move a charge of 10⁻⁵ C through a distance of 10 cm against a uniform electric field. The intensity of that electric field is
10⁵ N C⁻¹
10⁶ N C⁻¹
Correct10⁷ N C⁻¹
Her answer10⁸ N C⁻¹
Given
W = 10 J.
q = 10⁻⁵ C.
d = 10 cm = 0.1 m, moved against the field.
Asked
The field intensity E.
Concept to use
For a uniform field and motion straight along it, work is simply W = qEd. The only place to slip is the unit conversion — 10 cm must become 0.1 m, not 10.
DiagramAnimatedW = qEd, with the distance converted to metres first.
Formula to useW = qEd → E = W/(qd)
Baby steps
Convert: d = 10 cm = 0.1 m.
E = W/(qd) = 10 / (10⁻⁵ × 0.1).
Denominator: 10⁻⁵ × 10⁻¹ = 10⁻⁶.
E = 10 / 10⁻⁶ = 10⁷ N C⁻¹.
Answer
E = 10⁷ N C⁻¹
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
10⁵
rule out
Two powers too small; would need d = 10 m.
10⁶
rule out
One power too small; would need d = 1 m.
10⁷
keep
10 ÷ (10⁻⁵ × 0.1) = 10 ÷ 10⁻⁶.
10⁸
rule out
One power too large — exactly what you get by using d = 10 cm as though it were 10 m⁻¹, or by leaving the distance out altogether.
Shortcut
Work purely in powers of ten and the arithmetic is trivial: 10¹ ÷ (10⁻⁵ × 10⁻¹) = 10¹⁺⁶ = 10⁷. Adding and subtracting exponents is far safer than typing decimals into a calculator.
Where it went wrong
10⁸ is exactly ten times too large, which points squarely at the distance: using 10 instead of 0.1 shifts the answer by one power of ten. Converting centimetres to metres before substituting — and writing “0.1 m” explicitly on the page — is the whole fix.
Q 103Attempted · wrongPotential at the centre of a square
Four identical charges each +Q are at the vertices of a square of side L. The electric potential at the center of the square is 'V'. If one of the charges is reversed in sign, the potential now at the center of the square will be
−V/2
3V/4
CorrectV/2
Her answer−3V/4
Given
Four charges +Q at the corners of a square of side L.
All four are the same distance L/√2 from the centre.
Potential at the centre = V.
Asked
The new potential when one charge is reversed to −Q.
Concept to use
Potential is a scalar, so the four contributions simply add with no direction to worry about. Each contributes V/4. Reversing one charge changes its contribution from +V/4 to −V/4 — a change of V/2, not of V/4.
DiagramAnimatedFour equal contributions; reversing one costs twice as much as removing it.
Formula to useV_total = 4 × (kQ/(L/√2)) = V → each corner gives V/4
Baby steps
All four corners are equidistant from the centre, so each contributes V/4.
Reversing one turns its +V/4 into −V/4.
New total = 3(V/4) + (−V/4) = 2V/4 = V/2.
Equivalently: the change is V/4 − (−V/4) = V/2 subtracted from V, giving V/2.
Answer
V/2
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
−V/2
rule out
Three charges are still positive, so the total cannot be negative.
3V/4
rule out
This is what you get by removing one charge rather than reversing it. Reversing costs twice as much.
V/2
keep
Three at +V/4 and one at −V/4 gives 2V/4.
−3V/4
rule out
Wrong sign and wrong magnitude — it treats three charges as negative rather than one.
Shortcut
The key idea in one line: reversing a charge is twice as big a change as removing it. Removing takes away V/4; reversing takes away V/4 and then subtracts another V/4. Both 3V/4 and V/2 are on the option list precisely to separate those two.
Where it went wrong
−3V/4 has the sign of the whole answer flipped, as though the reversal applied to three charges rather than one. Because potential is a scalar there is nothing directional to reason about here — just four numbers being added, three of them positive. A quick sanity check settles it: with three positives and one negative the total must still be positive.
Q 104Left blankField from the slope of a V–x graph
Variation of electric potential (V) with distance (x) is as shown. The force on a particle of charge 5 μC at x = 1.2 cm has a magnitude of
25 dyne
Correct250 dyne
2500 dyne
2.5 dyne
Given
V rises linearly from 0 to 10 V between x = 0 and x = 2 cm.
V is flat at 10 V from 2 cm to 5 cm, then falls to 0 by 6 cm.
Charge q = 5 μC = 5 × 10⁻⁶ C, at x = 1.2 cm.
Asked
The magnitude of the force on the charge.
Concept to use
The field is the negative slope of the V–x graph, so the first job is to find which straight segment the point lies on. x = 1.2 cm is on the rising ramp between 0 and 2 cm, where the slope is constant.
DiagramAnimatedThe field is the slope, so first find which segment you are on.
Formula to useE = −dV/dx ; F = qE ; 1 N = 10⁵ dyne
Baby steps
x = 1.2 cm lies on the rising section from 0 to 2 cm.
Slope there = 10 V over 2 cm = 10 V / 0.02 m = 500 V m⁻¹.
So |E| = 500 N C⁻¹.
F = qE = 5 × 10⁻⁶ × 500 = 2.5 × 10⁻³ N.
Convert: 2.5 × 10⁻³ N × 10⁵ = 250 dyne.
Answer
250 dyne
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
25 dyne
rule out
Ten times too small; would need a slope of 50 V m⁻¹.
250 dyne
keep
Slope 500 V/m, charge 5 μC, and 1 N = 10⁵ dyne.
2500 dyne
rule out
Ten times too large — the usual result of treating 2 cm as 0.002 m.
2.5 dyne
rule out
This is the force in newtons × 10³, i.e. the conversion to dyne left undone.
Shortcut
Two things to fix before calculating. Which segment am I on? — because a flat section would give zero force. And 1 newton = 10⁵ dyne, which is the conversion this question is really testing. The slope itself is just 10 V over 2 cm.
Q 105Left blankWork from the field at a point
The electric intensity at a point at a distance 2 m from charge q is E. The amount of work done in bringing a charge of 2 C from infinity to this point will be (in S.I. units)
2E
Correct4E
E/2
E/4
Given
Field at 2 m from charge q is E.
A charge of 2 C is brought from infinity to that point.
Asked
The work done.
Concept to use
Work needs the potential, not the field — so convert. For a point charge V = kq/r and E = kq/r², so V = E × r. Multiply the field by the distance and you have the potential; multiply that by the charge and you have the work.
DiagramAnimatedV = E × r for a point charge, then W = qV.
Formula to useV = E × r ; W = qV
Baby steps
V = E × r = E × 2 = 2E volts.
W = qV, with q = 2 C.
W = 2 × 2E = 4E joules.
Answer
W = 4E
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
2E
rule out
This is the potential at the point, not the work. The charge of 2 C still has to be multiplied in.
4E
keep
V = 2E, and W = qV = 2 × 2E.
E/2
rule out
Dividing rather than multiplying by the distance.
E/4
rule out
Wrong on both operations.
Shortcut
V = E × r for a point charge — one power of r separates the two. Then W = qV. Notice that 2E appears as an option: it is the halfway answer, and the trap for anyone who stops after finding the potential. Always check whether the question asked for V or for W.
Q 106Attempted · wrongDipole potential and distance
The electrostatic potential due to an electric dipole at a distance 'r' varies as:
r
Correct1/r²
Her answer1/r³
1/r
Given
An electric dipole.
Potential measured at distance r, far from the dipole.
Asked
How the potential falls with distance.
Concept to use
A dipole is two equal and opposite charges close together, so their potentials very nearly cancel. That partial cancellation costs one extra power of r compared with a single charge: a point charge gives V ∝ 1/r, a dipole gives V ∝ 1/r². The field then falls one power faster still, as 1/r³.
DiagramAnimatedDipole potential falls one power faster than a point charge's.
Formula to usepoint charge: V ∝ 1/r, E ∝ 1/r² dipole: V ∝ 1/r², E ∝ 1/r³
Baby steps
For a single point charge, V = kq/r, so V ∝ 1/r.
A dipole's two charges are opposite, so their potentials almost cancel, leaving a much smaller residue.
That residue is V = kp cosθ/r², so V ∝ 1/r².
The field, being the gradient of V, falls one power faster: E ∝ 1/r³.
Answer
V ∝ 1/r²
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
r
rule out
Potential must decrease with distance, not grow.
1/r²
keep
The dipole potential is kp cosθ/r².
1/r³
rule out
This is the dipole FIELD, not the potential. The two are one power apart, and this is the confusion the question is built on.
1/r
rule out
That is the potential of a single point charge, before any cancellation.
Shortcut
Keep the four results as a 2 × 2 grid. Charge: V ∝ 1/r, E ∝ 1/r². Dipole: V ∝ 1/r², E ∝ 1/r³. Moving right (V to E) costs one power; moving down (charge to dipole) costs one power. Every question of this type is a lookup in that grid.
Where it went wrong
1/r³ is the dipole field, and it was given for the potential. The two are always one power of r apart, because E is the rate of change of V. Reading whether the question says field or potential — and then locating the right cell in the grid above — makes this a two-second question rather than a recall gamble.
Q 108Left blankHollow sphere · from a potential difference to a field
A hollow charged metal sphere has radius r. If the potential difference between its surface and a point at distance 2r from the centre is v, then the electric field intensity at distance 3r from the centre is
v/6r
v/4r
v/9r
Correct2v/9r
Given
Hollow charged sphere of radius r.
V(surface) − V(2r) = v.
Field wanted at 3r from the centre.
Asked
The electric field at 3r.
Concept to use
Outside a charged sphere everything behaves as though the charge sat at the centre. So use V = kQ/d outside, find the combination kQ from the given potential difference, and then substitute into E = kQ/d². The trick is that kQ is the unknown you actually solve for, not Q itself.
DiagramAnimatedSolve for the group kQ, then substitute into E.
Formula to useoutside: V = kQ/d , E = kQ/d²
Baby steps
V(surface) = kQ/r and V(2r) = kQ/2r.
Difference: kQ/r − kQ/2r = kQ/2r = v.
So kQ = 2vr.
E at 3r = kQ/(3r)² = 2vr/9r².
E = 2v/9r.
Answer
E = 2v/9r
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
v/6r
rule out
Would follow from kQ = (2/3)vr — the potential difference mishandled.
v/4r
rule out
Would need kQ = 2.25vr; no step produces that.
v/9r
rule out
Right denominator but the factor of 2 from kQ = 2vr has been lost.
2v/9r
keep
kQ = 2vr from the surface-to-2r drop, then divided by (3r)².
Shortcut
Solve for the whole group kQ rather than for Q. Every quantity in this question is kQ divided by some power of the distance, so once kQ = 2vr is on the page the rest is one substitution. Chasing Q separately means carrying k around for no reason.
Q 109Left blankPotential inside and outside a conductor
If a charged spherical conductor of radius 10 cm has potential V at a point distant 5 cm from its centre, then the potential at a point distant 15 cm from the centre will be
V/3
Correct2V/3
3V/2
V
Given
Charged spherical conductor, radius 10 cm.
Potential at 5 cm from the centre is V.
Potential wanted at 15 cm from the centre.
Asked
The potential at 15 cm.
Concept to use
The point at 5 cm is inside the conductor, and inside a charged conductor the potential is constant and equal to the surface value. So V is really the potential at the surface, 10 cm out. The point at 15 cm is outside, where V falls as 1/d.
DiagramAnimatedInside a conductor the potential is flat at the surface value.
Formula to useinside: V = V_surface (constant) outside: V ∝ 1/d
Baby steps
5 cm < 10 cm, so that point is inside the conductor.
Inside a conductor V is constant, so V is also the surface potential at 10 cm.
15 cm is outside, where V ∝ 1/d.
V(15) = V(10) × (10/15) = 2V/3.
Answer
2V/3
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
V/3
rule out
Would need the ratio 5/15. But 5 cm is inside, so it is the 10 cm surface value that carries across.
2V/3
keep
V at the surface (10 cm) is V; scaling by 10/15 gives 2V/3.
3V/2
rule out
The ratio inverted. Potential must fall as you move outward.
V
rule out
The potential is constant only inside; at 15 cm we are outside and it has dropped.
Shortcut
Check first whether each point is inside or outside — that single check is the whole question. Here the “5 cm” is a decoy: any point inside gives the surface value, so the real starting point is 10 cm. Then it is just the ratio 10/15.
Q 116Left blankPotential energy and separation
Identify the wrong statement.
The electrostatic potential energy of a system of two protons shall increase if the separation between the two is decreased
CorrectThe electrostatic potential energy of two protons shall increase if the separation between the two is increased
The electrostatic potential energy of a proton-electron system will increase if the separation between the two is increased
The electrostatic potential energy of a system of two electrons shall increase if the separation between the two is decreased
Given
U = kq₁q₂/r for a pair of charges.
Four statements about how U changes with separation.
Asked
Which statement is wrong.
Concept to use
Everything follows from the sign of the product q₁q₂. For like charges U is positive and falls towards zero as r grows. For unlike charges U is negative and rises towards zero as r grows — because a less negative number is a larger number.
DiagramAnimatedLike charges fall towards zero; unlike charges rise towards it.
Formula to useU = kq₁q₂/r ; like: U > 0, falls with r ; unlike: U < 0, rises with r
Baby steps
(a) Two protons, separation decreased: U is positive and gets larger. True.
(b) Two protons, separation increased: U is positive and gets smaller, not larger. FALSE — this is the answer.
(c) Proton and electron, separation increased: U is negative and moves up towards zero, so it increases. True.
(d) Two electrons, separation decreased: like charges again, so U rises. True.
Answer
“The electrostatic potential energy of two protons shall increase if the separation is increased”
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
(a) two protons, closer
rule out
Correct — pushing like charges together stores energy.
(b) two protons, further apart
keep
This is the answer, because the question asks for the wrong statement. Like charges lose potential energy as they separate.
(c) proton and electron, further apart
rule out
Correct, and the subtle one: U goes from a large negative value up towards zero, which is an increase.
(d) two electrons, closer
rule out
Correct — same as (a) with the opposite sign of charge, and the product is still positive.
Shortcut
Two rules and every statement is decided in a second: like charges — closer means more energy. Unlike charges — further means more energy. Statements (a) and (d) are the first rule, (c) is the second, and (b) contradicts the first. Note that (c) is the one that looks wrong but is right, because “less negative” is an increase.
Q 117Attempted · wrongPath independence and closed loops
Worth knowing the key is arguableThe two statements are logically equivalent for a conservative field — path independence and zero work around a closed loop imply each other. On that reading Statement-2 does explain Statement-1, and option (a) would be defensible. The paper's key takes them as separate facts. Both statements are certainly TRUE, so the safe ground is that any option calling either one false is wrong — and that is where the mark was actually lost.
Statement-1: For a charged particle moving from point P to point Q, the net work done by an electrostatic field on the particle is independent of the path connecting point P to point Q. Statement-2: The net work done by a conservative force on an object moving along a closed loop is zero.
Statement-1 is true, Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is the correct explanation of Statement-1.
CorrectStatement-1 is true, Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is not the correct explanation of Statement-1.
Her answerStatement-1 is false, Statement-2 is true
Statement-1 is true, Statement-2 is false.
Given
Statement-1 about path independence in an electrostatic field.
Statement-2 about zero work around a closed loop for a conservative force.
Asked
The truth of each statement and their relationship.
Concept to use
The electrostatic force is conservative, and that single property gives both statements. Work done depends only on the endpoints, so any path from P to Q gives the same answer; and going out and back around a closed loop returns you to the starting potential, so the total work is zero.
DiagramAnimatedWork depends only on the endpoints, never on the route.
Formula to useW = q(Vₚ − V₪) — endpoints only, no path in the expression
Baby steps
The work done by an electrostatic field is W = q(Vₚ − V₪).
Only the two potentials appear — the route between them does not enter at all. So Statement-1 is TRUE.
For a closed loop the start and end points coincide, so Vₚ = V₪ and W = 0. Statement-2 is TRUE.
Both statements are therefore true, whatever view one takes of the explanation link.
Answer
Both statements are true (see the note above on the explanation link)
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
both true, S2 explains S1
rule out
Marked incorrect by the paper, though it is arguably defensible — the two statements are equivalent for a conservative field.
both true, S2 does not explain
keep
The paper's key. Both statements are certainly true, which is the part that matters.
S1 false, S2 true
rule out
Statement-1 is a direct consequence of W = qΔV and is definitely true.
S1 true, S2 false
rule out
Statement-2 is the definition of a conservative force and is definitely true.
Shortcut
Judge each statement on its own before worrying about the explanation link. Here both are unambiguously true, which eliminates two of the four options immediately and guarantees you are choosing between (a) and (b) rather than risking a false-statement option.
Where it went wrong
Statement-1 was called false, and it is one of the most secure results in the chapter — W = q(Vₚ − V₪) contains no path at all. The habit that protects you here is the one above: settle true or false for each statement independently first. Even if the explanation link is debatable, you are then choosing between the two “both true” options rather than picking one that denies a standard result.
Q 119Attempted · wrongDipole · minimum potential energy
An electric dipole of moment P⃗ placed in a uniform electric field E⃗ has minimum potential energy when the angle between P⃗ and E⃗ is
Correctzero
Her answerπ/2
π
3π/2
Given
A dipole of moment P in a uniform field E.
U = −pE cosθ.
Asked
The angle at which U is minimum.
Concept to use
The minus sign in U = −pE cosθ does all the work. U is smallest when cosθ is largest, i.e. cosθ = 1 and θ = 0. That is the aligned position — and physically it makes sense: a dipole left alone in a field turns until it lines up, so that must be the position of lowest energy.
DiagramAnimatedThe minus sign puts the minimum where cosθ is largest.
Formula to useU = −pE cosθ ; U_min = −pE at θ = 0 ; U_max = +pE at θ = π
Baby steps
U = −pE cosθ.
For U to be minimum, −cosθ must be minimum, so cosθ must be maximum.
cosθ is largest at θ = 0, where cosθ = 1.
So U_min = −pE at θ = 0, the aligned position.
At θ = π/2, U = 0 — larger than −pE, so not the minimum.
Answer
θ = zero
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
zero
keep
cos 0 = 1, so U = −pE, the most negative value available.
π/2
rule out
Here U = 0. Zero is larger than −pE, so this is not the minimum — it is the position of zero energy, which is a different thing.
π
rule out
cosπ = −1 gives U = +pE, the MAXIMUM energy — the unstable, anti-aligned position.
3π/2
rule out
cos = 0 again, so U = 0, same as π/2.
Shortcut
Skip the formula and reason physically: a dipole released in a field turns until it aligns, and things come to rest at minimum energy. So aligned (θ = 0) must be the minimum, and anti-aligned (θ = π) the maximum. Also useful: θ = 0 is stable equilibrium, θ = π unstable, and θ = π/2 gives maximum torque, not minimum energy.
Where it went wrong
π/2 gives U = 0, and zero can feel like the smallest available value — but the minimum here is −pE, which is less than zero. This is the same signed-value slip as Q116 on this paper, where “less negative” had to be read as an increase. Whenever an energy can be negative, ask which value is furthest down the number line rather than which is closest to zero.
π/2 is also the angle of maximum torque, which may be the fact that came to mind — worth keeping the two separate.
Q 121Attempted · wrongWork in rotating a dipole
An electric dipole is along a uniform electric field. If it is deflected by 60°, work done by an agent is 2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J. Then the work done by an agent, if it is deflected by 30° further is
Her answer2.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ J
Correct2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J
4 × 10⁻¹⁹ J
2 × 10⁻¹⁶ J
Given
Dipole starts aligned with the field, θ = 0.
Rotating to 60° requires work 2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
It is then deflected 30° further, to 90°.
Asked
The work done in the second stage.
Concept to use
Work done by an agent rotating a dipole is the change in potential energy, and it depends on the cosines of the two angles, not on the angle swept. So equal angular steps do not require equal work — you must compute each stage from its own endpoints.
DiagramAnimatedTrack the cosine, not the angle swept.
Formula to useW = pE(cosθ₁ − cosθ₂)
Baby steps
First stage, 0° to 60°: W₁ = pE(cos0 − cos60) = pE(1 − ½) = ½pE.
Given W₁ = 2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J, so pE = 4 × 10⁻¹⁹ J.
Second stage, 60° to 90°: W₂ = pE(cos60 − cos90) = pE(½ − 0) = ½pE.
So W₂ = ½ × 4 × 10⁻¹⁹ = 2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J — exactly the same as the first stage.
Answer
2 × 10⁻¹⁹ J
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
2.5 × 10⁻¹⁹
rule out
There is no route to this. It looks like a proportional estimate — as though 30° more should cost somewhat more.
2 × 10⁻¹⁹
keep
Both stages happen to require ½pE, because cos falls from 1 to ½ and then from ½ to 0 — equal drops.
4 × 10⁻¹⁹
rule out
This is pE itself, the total work from 0° to 90° — not the second stage alone.
2 × 10⁻¹⁶
rule out
Right digits, wrong power of ten by a factor of a thousand.
Shortcut
Track the cosine, not the angle. cos goes 1 → ½ over the first 60°, and ½ → 0 over the next 30°. Both are drops of ½, so both stages cost the same work. Seeing that coincidence turns the question into a one-line answer with no value of pE ever needed.
Where it went wrong
2.5 × 10⁻¹⁹ is not obtainable from any correct working, which suggests an estimate rather than a calculation — the intuition that a further 30° should cost a bit more. But work in rotating a dipole tracks the change in cosθ, and cos changes fastest near 90°, not near 0°. Writing W = pE(cosθ₁ − cosθ₂) and filling in both angles for each stage separately avoids the guesswork entirely.
Q 122Attempted · wrongWhat an equipotential surface is
Equipotential surface is that
CorrectOn which no work is done to move a charge from one point to the other on the same surface.
On which work is done to move a charge from one point to the other on the same surface.
Her answerSurface of zero electric intensity
The field lines of force are parallel to it
Given
The definition of an equipotential surface.
Asked
Which statement describes it correctly.
Concept to use
An equipotential surface is one on which the potential is the same everywhere. Since work is W = qΔV and ΔV = 0 along the surface, no work is done moving a charge across it. That does not mean the field is zero — it means the field has no component along the surface, which is why field lines always cross an equipotential at right angles.
DiagramAnimatedZero work along the surface, but the field is not zero.
Formula to useV constant on the surface → ΔV = 0 → W = qΔV = 0
Baby steps
By definition, V is the same at every point on the surface.
Work done moving a charge between two points on it: W = q(V₁ − V₂) = q(0) = 0.
The field is generally not zero — it is simply perpendicular to the surface, so it does no work along it.
Field lines meet an equipotential at 90°, never parallel to it.
Answer
On which no work is done to move a charge from one point to the other on the same surface
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
no work done
keep
ΔV = 0 along the surface, so W = qΔV = 0.
work is done
rule out
The exact opposite of the definition.
surface of zero electric intensity
rule out
A common confusion. The field around a point charge is strong everywhere, yet every sphere around it is an equipotential. Zero work is not zero field.
field lines parallel to it
rule out
Field lines are perpendicular to an equipotential. If they had any parallel component, work would be done along the surface.
Shortcut
Picture the spheres around a point charge. Each is an equipotential, and the field on them is large — so zero work does not mean zero field. The field simply points straight through the surface, contributing nothing to motion along it. That one picture rules out two of the four options.
Where it went wrong
“Surface of zero electric intensity” confuses no work with no field. They are different: work depends on the field's component along the path, and on an equipotential that component is zero while the field itself is not. The concentric-spheres picture settles it, and it is the same picture needed for Q123 on this paper, where the field inside a conductor really is zero and that is why the potential is constant.
Q 123Attempted · wrongField and potential inside a conductor
The electrostatic potential on the surface of a charged conducting sphere is 100 V. Two statements are made in this regard: S₁: At any point inside the sphere, electric intensity is zero. S₂: At any point inside the sphere, the electrostatic potential is 100 V.
Her answerS₁ is true but S₂ is false
Both S₁ and S₂ are false
CorrectS₁ is true, S₂ is also true and S₁ is the cause of S₂
S₁ is true, S₂ is also true but the statements are independent
Given
A charged conducting sphere with surface potential 100 V.
Two statements about the interior.
Asked
The truth of each statement and whether one causes the other.
Concept to use
Inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium the field must be zero — otherwise free charges would keep moving. And zero field means zero potential gradient, so the potential cannot change from point to point: it is constant, and equal to the surface value. The second fact is a direct consequence of the first.
DiagramAnimatedE = 0 inside is exactly WHY V is constant inside.
Formula to useE = −dV/dx ; E = 0 inside → V constant inside = V at the surface
Baby steps
S₁. Free charges rearrange until the interior field is zero. True.
S₂. With E = 0 everywhere inside, V has zero gradient, so it cannot vary — it stays at the surface value of 100 V. True.
Is S₁ the cause of S₂? Yes: E = −dV/dx, so a zero field is exactly what forces the potential to be constant.
So both are true and S₁ causes S₂.
Answer
S₁ is true, S₂ is also true and S₁ is the cause of S₂
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
S₁ true, S₂ false
rule out
A very common error — assuming that because the field is zero the potential must be zero too. Zero field means unchanging potential, not zero potential.
both false
rule out
Both are standard results for a conductor in equilibrium.
both true, S₁ causes S₂
keep
E = −dV/dx makes the causal link explicit.
both true but independent
rule out
They are not independent — one follows directly from the other through E = −dV/dx.
Shortcut
The relation to hold is E = −dV/dx. It says the field is the rate of change of potential, not the potential itself. So zero field means the potential is flat — and a flat non-zero value is perfectly possible. The mental image: level ground has no slope, but it can still be a hundred metres above sea level.
Where it went wrong
S₂ was called false, which is the classic zero-field-means-zero-potential slip. The two are related by a derivative: E is how fast V changes, so E = 0 pins V to a constant without saying anything about its value. The surface is at 100 V, so the whole interior is at 100 V. This is the same field-versus-potential distinction that decided Q122 just before it — two questions, eight marks, one relation.
Q 127Attempted · wrongEnergy conservation with electric potential
A body of mass 1 gm and carrying a charge 10⁻⁸ C passes from two points P and Q. P and Q are at electric potentials 600 V and 0 V respectively. The velocity of the body at Q is 20 cm s⁻¹. Its velocity in m s⁻¹ at P is
Correct√0.028
Her answer√0.056
√0.56
√5.6
Given
m = 1 g = 10⁻³ kg, q = 10⁻⁸ C.
Vₚ = 600 V, V₪ = 0 V.
v₪ = 20 cm s⁻¹ = 0.2 m s⁻¹.
Asked
The velocity at P.
Concept to use
Total energy is conserved: kinetic + electric potential energy is the same at P and at Q. The charge is positive and moves from high potential to low, so it gains kinetic energy on the way — meaning vₚ must be smaller than v₪. That sanity check alone rules out two options.
DiagramAnimatedA positive charge falling through a potential drop speeds up.
Formula to use½mvₚ² + qVₚ = ½mv₪² + qV₪
Baby steps
½mvₚ² = ½mv₪² + q(V₪ − Vₚ) = ½mv₪² − q(600).
½(10⁻³)vₚ² = ½(10⁻³)(0.04) − (10⁻⁸)(600).
= 2 × 10⁻⁵ − 6 × 10⁻⁶ = 1.4 × 10⁻⁵.
vₚ² = 2 × 1.4 × 10⁻⁵ / 10⁻³ = 0.028.
vₚ = √0.028 ≈ 0.167 m s⁻¹, which is indeed less than 0.2. ✓
Answer
√0.028 m s⁻¹
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
√0.028
keep
Gives 0.167 m/s, correctly slower than the 0.2 m/s at Q.
√0.056
rule out
Gives 0.237 m/s — faster at P than at Q, which would mean the positive charge lost energy while falling through a potential drop. It comes from adding the qV term instead of subtracting it.
√0.56
rule out
Ten times too large in v².
√5.6
rule out
A hundred times too large.
Shortcut
Do the direction check before the arithmetic. A positive charge moving from 600 V to 0 V is being pushed along, so it speeds up — therefore vₚ < v₪ = 0.2. Since 0.2² = 0.04, the answer must have vₚ² below 0.04, and only √0.028 qualifies. That eliminates three options in a few seconds.
Where it went wrong
√0.056 gives a speed at P of 0.237 m/s, larger than the 0.2 m/s at Q — which would mean a positive charge lost speed while falling through a potential drop. The qV term was added where it should have been subtracted. The direction check above catches this instantly and is worth doing first every time, because sign errors in energy equations are almost impossible to spot by re-reading.
Q 128Attempted · wrongMerging charged drops
Eight small drops, each of radius r and having same charge q are combined to form a big drop. The ratio between the potentials of the bigger drop and the smaller drop is
8 : 1
Correct4 : 1
Her answer2 : 1
1 : 8
Given
Eight drops, each radius r and charge q.
They merge into a single big drop.
Asked
The ratio V_big : V_small.
Concept to use
Two quantities behave differently on merging. Charge simply adds: the big drop carries 8q. But volume adds, not radius — so R³ = 8r³ and R = 2r. The radius only doubles while the charge multiplies by eight, and the potential ratio is 8/2.
DiagramAnimatedVolume adds, so the radius only goes up by the cube root.
Formula to useR = n⅓ r ; V = kQ/R
Baby steps
Charge: Q = 8q.
Volume conservation: 8 × (4/3)πr³ = (4/3)πR³, so R³ = 8r³ and R = 2r.
V_big = k(8q)/(2r) = 4kq/r.
V_small = kq/r.
Ratio = 4 : 1.
Answer
4 : 1
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
8 : 1
rule out
This uses the charge ratio alone and forgets that the radius also grows.
4 : 1
keep
Charge ×8 over radius ×2 gives 8/2 = 4.
2 : 1
rule out
This is the ratio of the radii, not of the potentials. It drops the charge increase entirely.
1 : 8
rule out
Inverted, and using the wrong quantity as well.
Shortcut
Learn the merging rules as a set for n drops: R = n⅓r, Q = nq, V ∝ n⅔³, and the surface charge density goes as n⅓. For n = 8: R doubles, Q multiplies by 8, and V multiplies by 8⅔³ = 4. The cube root is the step that gets skipped.
Where it went wrong
2 : 1 is the ratio of the radii, which is the right intermediate result reported as the final answer — the charge increase never made it into the calculation. Since V = kQ/R, both the numerator and the denominator change and both must be carried. Writing the two changes side by side (charge ×8, radius ×2) before dividing keeps them both in view.
Q 129Attempted · wrongMoving a charge along an arc
Two charges q₁ and q₂ are placed 30 cm apart, as shown in the figure. A third charge q₃ is moved along the arc of a circle of radius 40 cm from C to D. The change in the potential energy of the system is (q₃/4πε₀) k, where k is
Correct8q₂
8q₁
Her answer6q₂
6q₁
Given
q₁ at A and q₂ at B, 30 cm apart.
q₃ moves along an arc of radius 40 cm centred on A, from C to D.
C is directly above A; D is on the line AB extended.
Asked
The value of k in the expression for ΔU.
Concept to use
The arc is centred on A, so q₃ stays exactly 40 cm from q₁ the whole way — meaning q₁ contributes nothing at all to the change in energy. Only the distance to q₂ changes, and that is the entire calculation.
DiagramAnimatedThe arc is centred on q₁, so q₁ contributes nothing.
Formula to useΔU = (q₂q₃/4πε₀)(1/r_D − 1/r_C)
Baby steps
Because the arc is centred on A, the distance A–q₃ is 40 cm at both C and D. q₁ drops out.
Distance from q₂ to C: C is 40 cm above A and q₂ is 30 cm along, so √(30² + 40²) = 50 cm.
Distance from q₂ to D: D is 40 cm from A along the line, and q₂ is at 30 cm, so 40 − 30 = 10 cm.
The factor 8 comes from 10 − 2, and it multiplies q₂ because only q₂'s distance changed.
8q₁
rule out
Right factor, wrong charge. q₁ is at the centre of the arc, so its distance never changes.
6q₂
rule out
Right charge, wrong factor — 6 would need distances of 1/0.125 and 1/0.5, or a misread of the geometry.
6q₁
rule out
Wrong on both counts.
Shortcut
Look at what the arc is centred on before computing anything. Any charge at the centre of the arc contributes zero to ΔU, because its distance is constant. That observation removes half the problem instantly — and the 40 cm radius in the stem is the clue that A is the centre.
Then note the 3-4-5 triangle: 30 and 40 give 50 without any square roots.
Where it went wrong
The right charge was identified, so the key insight — that q₁ drops out — had landed. The factor came out as 6 instead of 8, which points at one of the two distances. The likely culprit is the distance to D: it is 40 − 30 = 10 cm, measured from q₂ at B rather than from A. Marking both distances on the figure before substituting is what secures the remaining half.
Q 134Attempted · wrongPotential from an infinite series of charges
An infinite number of electric charges, equal to 1 C in magnitude, are placed along X-axis at x = 2 cm, 4 cm, 8 cm, and so on. If they are of same sign, then electric potential at x = 0 is (in volts)
Correct9 × 10¹¹
Her answerZero
3 × 10⁹
1.25 × 10⁹
Given
Charges of 1 C each at x = 2, 4, 8, 16, … cm.
All of the same sign.
Potential wanted at x = 0.
Asked
The total potential at the origin.
Concept to use
Potential is a scalar and all the charges have the same sign, so everything simply adds — there is no cancellation. The distances double each time, so the terms 1/r form a geometric progression with ratio ½, which converges to a finite sum. Infinitely many terms does not mean an infinite answer.
DiagramAnimatedDistances double, so the series is a GP that sums to twice the first term.
Formula to useV = kq(1/r₁ + 1/r₂ + …) ; GP sum = a/(1 − r)
Baby steps
V = kq(1/0.02 + 1/0.04 + 1/0.08 + …) with all distances in metres.
Factor out the first term: = kq × (1/0.02) × (1 + ½ + ¼ + …).
The bracket is a GP with first term 1 and ratio ½, so it sums to 1/(1 − ½) = 2.
V = 9 × 10⁹ × 1 × 50 × 2 = 9 × 10¹¹ V.
Answer
9 × 10¹¹ V
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
9 × 10¹¹
keep
kq × 50 × 2, using the GP sum of 2.
Zero
rule out
Zero would need cancellation, and the stem says all the charges have the same sign. Same-sign potentials can only add.
3 × 10⁹
rule out
Far too small — smaller even than the first charge's contribution of 4.5 × 10¹¹.
1.25 × 10⁹
rule out
Also far too small, and not obtainable from any sum here.
Shortcut
Two checks make this quick. First, the answer must be at least the contribution of the nearest charge alone: kq/0.02 = 4.5 × 10¹¹. That immediately kills the two small options and zero. Second, the distances double, so the GP ratio is ½ and the sum is just twice the first term — giving 9 × 10¹¹ directly.
Where it went wrong
“Zero” would require the contributions to cancel, and the question specifically says the charges are all of the same sign. The likely reasoning is that infinitely many terms must give either infinity or nothing — but a geometric series with ratio below 1 converges to a finite value. It is worth noting that this is a potential question, not a field question: fields would need vector addition, but potentials are scalars and same-sign potentials can never cancel.
What the nineteen have in common
Reading the paper as a whole
Potential is not field — six questions turn on it
Q
What was confused
106
Gave the dipole field law (1/r³) when asked for the
potential (1/r²).
122
Read “no work done” as “zero field”. An
equipotential has a strong field; it just has no component along the surface.
123
Read “zero field inside” as “zero potential
inside”. E = −dV/dx means flat, not zero.
93
Both quantities given, and the distance V/E was not extracted.
105
Stopped at the potential (2E) instead of going on to the work
(4E).
104
The field is the slope of the V–x graph, not its
height.
The relation that ties all six together is E = −dV/dx: the field is the rate at
which the potential changes. Zero field means the potential is flat, not zero — and a
constant non-zero value is perfectly ordinary.
Signed quantities — three more
Q119 — chose π/2, where U = 0. But the minimum is −pE, which is
less than zero. Smallest is not the same as closest to zero.
Q116 — the same idea in reverse: for unlike charges, moving apart makes U
less negative, which is an increase.
Q127 — the qV term was added where it should have been subtracted, giving a
speed at P higher than at Q, which is impossible for a positive charge falling through a
potential drop.
All three are fixed by the same habit: when a quantity can be negative, ask which value is
furthest down the number line, not which is nearest zero — and sanity-check the
direction before trusting the algebra.
The blanks were mostly short
Q
The whole method
92
“Unit charge” means the work quoted is the
potential. No calculation at all.
105
V = E × r, then W = qV. Two multiplications.
109
5 cm is inside, so V is the surface value; then scale by
10/15.
108
Solve for the group kQ = 2vr, then substitute.
116
Two rules about like and unlike charges — no arithmetic.
Five questions, 20 marks, and none of them long.
Two habits for the next paper
Write down whether you need V or E before choosing a formula. They differ by one
power of r for a point charge and by one power again for a dipole. Six questions on this paper
turned on that single distinction.
Do a direction check before the arithmetic. In Q127, asking whether the charge should
speed up or slow down settles the answer in seconds and catches a sign error that re-reading the
algebra would not.