🏠 NEET Home

B1 ILTS – 09

Coordination Compounds

Chemistry · Class 12 Chapter 9 · error and blank review

Test date 06-09-2026Marks obtained 526NEET 2027 · Gr 12 Live Full Course
17questions in this chapter
7answered wrong
10left blank

Weak areas from this paper

Match-the-column: the outer rows keep getting swappedrecurring

Q84 — and Q151 in Zoology on the same paper

In Q84 the pairing chosen was A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV. B and D were right; A and C were exchanged. In Q151 the pairing chosen was A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV again — and again B and C were right while A and D were exchanged.

Twice in one paper, in different subjects, with the middle rows correct and the outer rows crossed. Notice that both wrong answers were the straight-down A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV option. That is not a chemistry error; it is the sequential option being picked when the matching is not finished.

Fix to drill. Never read List-II until List-I is fully worked. Write your own four conclusions in the margin, cover the options, then look. If the option you land on is the tidy A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV one, re-derive at least two rows before committing — setters put that option in deliberately.

Optical isomerism is being over-awardedrecurring

Q69, and the mirror image of it in Q54

Q69: optical isomerism was included for [Co(NH3)4(NO2)2]Cl, which has a mirror plane in both its cis and trans forms.

Q54: the assertion claimed three geometrical isomers, and it was accepted. Three is the count of stereoisomers, once the cis d/l pair is included — so the same confusion between the two categories appears in both questions, once by adding optical where it does not belong and once by folding it into a geometrical count.

Fix to drill. Before ticking optical, name the symmetry element that is absent. If you cannot say which mirror plane is missing, the complex is achiral. As a working rule for NEET: octahedral optical activity needs two or more chelate rings.

Ten of seventeen left blank, several of them one-linersattempt rate

Q46, 57, 70, 73, 77, 78, 80, 88, 89, 90

Q70 (nuclearity of Fe(CO)5), Q73 (90° means cis), Q89 (EDTA for lead) and Q90 (entities can be any charge) are pure recall, answerable in seconds. Q80 needs only the two ends of the spectrochemical series.

Coordination Compounds is one of the highest-yield chapters in the paper — seventeen questions here — and it rewards recall more than calculation. Leaving the recall questions blank costs more here than in any other chapter.

Fix to drill. Split the blanks into two lists: recall (Q57, 70, 73, 77, 89, 90) and reasoning (Q46, 78, 80, 88). Do the recall six as flashcards this week, and the reasoning four as a timed set.

Denticity and charge of the standard ligandsrecurring

Q64, Q68

Q64 gave 8 instead of 9, which means the coordination number was right but the oxidation number was +2 instead of +3 — consistent with oxalate being taken as −1.

Q68 gave 2 instead of 3, one chelator short.

Both are the same underlying gap: the standing table of ligand denticity and charge is not yet automatic, and almost every calculation in this chapter starts from it.

Fix to drill. Build a single reference card: ligand, formula, denticity, charge, chelating yes/no. Nine rows covers it — NH3, H2O, Cl, CN, NO2, en, ox, EDTA, acac. Recite it before every coordination practice set until it needs no thought.

Assertion-and-reason, again in both directionsrecurring

Q54, Q72

Q54: the true verdict is A false, R true; the exact opposite was marked. Q72: the true verdict is I correct, II incorrect; “both incorrect” was marked.

Q72 is the more informative of the two. Statement II was judged correctly, which means the chemistry was available — but that verdict appears to have spilled over onto Statement I, which is independently true. The Physics paper shows the identical pattern in Q15 and Q44.

Fix to drill. The same three-step written defence used in Physics applies here without change: write the verdict on A and its one-line reason; write the verdict on B and its one-line reason; only then read the options. Four assertion-reason errors across two subjects on one paper makes this the highest-value habit to fix.
Question by question
Q46Left blankWerner's theory from ionisation data

One mole of complex compound Co(NH3)xCly gives 3 moles of ions on dissolution in water. One mole of the same complex reacts with 2 moles of AgNO3 to yield 2 moles of AgCl precipitate. Then x and y respectively are

  • 4, 3
  • 5, 3
  • 6, 3
  • 3, 3
Given
3 moles of ions on dissolution; 2 moles of AgCl with excess AgNO3; cobalt in an ammine chloride complex.
Asked
The values of x (ammine ligands) and y (total chlorines).
Concepts

Werner's two valencies. Primary valency is the oxidation state, satisfied by the ions written outside the square bracket. Secondary valency is the coordination number, satisfied by ligands inside it.

Only species outside the bracket ionise, so only those precipitate with silver nitrate. Chloride bound inside the sphere is invisible to AgNO3.

Cobalt(III) has a coordination number of 6 — assume this unless a question forces otherwise. It is the single most-used fact in this chapter.

Formula
moles of AgCl = chlorides outside the bracket
moles of ions = 1 complex ion + counter ions

CN(Co3+) = 6
Baby steps
  1. 2 mol AgCl means 2 chlorides outside. So the formula is [Co(NH₃)xCly−2]Cl₂.
  2. Check the ion count: 1 complex cation + 2 chloride anions = 3 ions. ✓ That confirms the split rather than adding new information.
  3. Charge balance: the cation must be 2+ to pair with two Cl. With Co in the +3 state, +3 − (y−2) = +2, so y − 2 = 1 and y = 3.
  4. Fill the coordination sphere to 6: x + (y−2) = 6x + 1 = 6x = 5.
Answer — x = 5, y = 3
CoNH₃NH₃NH₃NH₃NH₃Clcoordination spheresecondary valency = 6does not ionise · no AgClCl⁻AgCl ↓Cl⁻AgCl ↓outside the spherefree to ioniseions on dissolving = 3AgCl formed = 2→ 2 Cl outside→ 1 Cl inside→ x = 5, y = 3[Co(NH₃)₅Cl]Cl₂ — only what sits outside the bracket meets the AgNO₃

Everything inside the bracket is invisible to silver nitrate.

Shortcut
Every option has y = 3, so the question is really only asking for x. Fill the sphere to 6 with one chloride already inside: x = 5. One line.
Q47Marked wrongSecondary valency from AgCl data

On the basis of the following observations made with aqueous solutions (moles of AgCl precipitated per mole of compound with excess AgNO3): I. PdCl2·4NH3 → 2; II. NiCl2·6H2O → 2; III. PtCl4·2HCl → 0; IV. CoCl3·4NH3 → 1; V. PtCl2·2NH3 → 0. The secondary valencies of I and IV are

  • 4 and 5 respectively
  • 4 and 6 respectively
  • 6 and 4 respectively
  • 2 and 4 respectively
Given
Five compounds with their AgCl yields. Attention is on I (PdCl2·4NH3, 2 AgCl) and IV (CoCl3·4NH3, 1 AgCl).
Asked
The secondary valency (coordination number) of I and of IV.
Concepts

Secondary valency = coordination number = the number of donor atoms inside the square bracket, whatever they happen to be.

The procedure is mechanical: the AgCl count tells you how many chlorides are outside; everything else in the formula must be inside; then count the donor atoms inside.

The trap in IV is forgetting that the chlorides left over after the ionisable ones are removed are still ligands, and still count.

Formula
AgCl moles = Cl outside the bracket
secondary valency = donor atoms inside

(NH3, H2O and bound Cl all count)
Baby steps
  1. Compound I, PdCl₂·4NH₃: 2 AgCl, so both chlorides are outside. Structure is [Pd(NH₃)₄]Cl₂.
  2. Count inside for I: 4 NH₃, nothing else. Secondary valency = 4.
  3. Compound IV, CoCl₃·4NH₃: only 1 AgCl, so 1 chloride outside and 2 chlorides inside. Structure is [Co(NH₃)₄Cl₂]Cl.
  4. Count inside for IV: 4 NH₃ + 2 Cl = 6. So the pair is 4 and 6.
Answer — 4 and 6 respectively
You marked: “4 and 5” — compound I was right. The slip is IV: after putting 4 NH3 and 2 Cl inside the sphere the count is 6, not 5. It looks like only one of the two bound chlorides was counted.
one AgCl per free chloride — the rest are insideformulaAgCltrue structureinside the sphereCNIPdCl₂·4NH₃2[Pd(NH₃)₄]Cl₂4 NH₃ inside4IINiCl₂·6H₂O2[Ni(H₂O)₆]Cl₂6 H₂O inside6IIIPtCl₄·2HCl0H₂[PtCl₆]6 Cl inside6IVCoCl₃·4NH₃1[Co(NH₃)₄Cl₂]Cl4 NH₃ + 2 Cl inside6VPtCl₂·2NH₃0[Pt(NH₃)₂Cl₂]2 NH₃ + 2 Cl inside4I and IV are the two the question asks for → 4 and 6

All five compounds resolved; the two the question asks about are highlighted.

Shortcut
Secondary valency is almost always 4 or 6. If a working gives 5, re-count — it is nearly always a ligand missed inside the bracket, and 5 is vanishingly rare at this level.
Q54Marked wrongAssertion and reason · geometrical isomers

Assertion (A): The total number of geometrical isomers shown by [Co(en)2Cl2]+ is three.
Reason (R): [Co(en)2Cl2]+ has an octahedral geometry.

  • Both A and R are correct but R is not the correct explanation of A
  • A is not correct but R is correct
  • A is correct but R is not correct
  • Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
Given
The complex ion [Co(en)2Cl2]+, with two bidentate en ligands and two chlorides.
Asked
The truth of A, the truth of R, and whether R explains A.
Concepts

Assertion. The two chlorides can only be adjacent (cis) or opposite (trans). There is no third arrangement — on an octahedron, any two positions are either 90° apart or 180° apart. So the count is 2, not 3, and A is false.

Where the 3 comes from: the cis form is chiral and exists as a d/l pair. Add those to trans and you get 3 stereoisomers. But optical isomers are not geometrical isomers, and A says geometrical.

Reason. Co(III) with a coordination number of 6 is octahedral. True, and independently so.

Formula
octahedral MA2B4-type → cis and trans only

geometrical isomers = 2
stereoisomers total = 3 (cis d, cis l, trans)
Baby steps
  1. Judge A alone. Place the first Cl anywhere; the second is either at 90° (cis) or 180° (trans). Two options. A claims three — false.
  2. Judge R alone. Co(III), coordination number 6 → octahedral. True.
  3. A false, R true → the option that says exactly that.
  4. The explanation clause never comes into play: once A is false, whether R explains it is not asked.
Answer — A is not correct but R is correct
You marked: the exact reverse — “A correct, R not correct”. Both verdicts were flipped, which is the signature of judging the pair as a unit instead of one at a time.
[Co(en)₂Cl₂]⁺ — the two Cl are either adjacent or opposite. That is all.MClenenenenClcis — Cl at 90°MClClenenenentrans — Cl at 180°geometrical isomers = 2, not 3the cis form is also chiral, but that is optical, not geometrical

Two chlorides on an octahedron: adjacent or opposite, nothing else.

Shortcut
When an assertion gives a count, verify the count and stop. Counting questions rarely need the reason at all — and here the reason is a standalone fact that is true no matter what A says.
Q57Left blankSymmetrical and unsymmetrical ligands

Which of the following is an unsymmetrical ligand?

  • Oxalato
  • Ethylenediamine
  • Ethylenediamine tetraacetate
  • Thiocyanate
Given
Four ligands: oxalato (C2O42−), en, EDTA4−, and thiocyanate (SCN).
Asked
Which one is unsymmetrical.
Concepts

A ligand is symmetrical when its donor atoms are equivalent — whichever end binds, the result is the same.

Oxalate donates through two identical oxygens. en donates through two identical nitrogens. EDTA's donor set is symmetric about its centre.

Thiocyanate is the odd one: S–C≡N. It can bind through sulphur (thiocyanato, –SCN) or through nitrogen (isothiocyanato, –NCS), and those give genuinely different compounds. Two different donor atoms means unsymmetrical — and it is the same property that makes it ambidentate.

Formula
symmetrical → donor atoms identical
unsymmetrical → donor atoms different

ambidentate ligands: SCN, NO2, CN
Baby steps
  1. Oxalate: two O donors, identical → symmetrical.
  2. en: two N donors, identical → symmetrical.
  3. EDTA: 2 N + 4 O, arranged symmetrically about the backbone → symmetrical.
  4. SCN: donor is S at one end, N at the other → unsymmetrical.
Answer — thiocyanate, SCN
Animation / diagram
Not needed — this one is pure recall.
Shortcut
Unsymmetrical and ambidentate are the same short list at this level: SCN, NO2, CN. If a question asks for either word, look for one of those three.
Q64Marked wrongCoordination number plus oxidation number

If the complex [M(en)2(C2O4)]Cl is known to exist then the sum of the coordination number and oxidation number of the metal M in the complex is (en = ethylenediamine)

  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Given
[M(en)2(C2O4)]Cl. en is neutral and bidentate; oxalate is 2− and bidentate; one chloride outside.
Asked
Coordination number + oxidation number.
Concepts

Coordination number counts donor atoms, not ligands. This is the single most common slip in the chapter. Three ligands, all bidentate, gives six donor atoms.

Oxidation number comes from charge balance. One chloride sits outside, so the complex ion carries +1. Inside, en contributes 0 and oxalate contributes −2.

Formula
CN = Σ (denticity × number of that ligand)
   = 2×2 + 2×1 = 6

x + 2(0) + (−2) = +1 → x = +3
Baby steps
  1. Denticities: en is bidentate, oxalate is bidentate.
  2. CN = (2 × 2) + (1 × 2) = 6. Six donor atoms, from three ligands.
  3. Charge on the complex ion: one Cl outside means +1 inside.
  4. x + 0 + 0 + (−2) = +1x = +3. Sum = 6 + 3 = 9.
Answer — 9
You marked: 8 — the coordination number of 6 was right, so the oxidation number came out as +2 instead of +3. The likely cause is treating oxalate as −1 rather than −2.
[M(en)₂(C₂O₄)]Clenbidentate+2enbidentate+2C₂O₄²⁻bidentate+2coordination number6charge balanceone Cl⁻ outside→ complex ion is +1en is neutral0oxalate is −2−2x + 0 − 2 = +1x = +3oxidation number+36 + 3 = 9

Coordination number from denticity; oxidation number from charge balance.

Shortcut
Lock in the charges you will need again and again: en 0, ox −2, EDTA −4, acac −1, NH3 and H2O 0. Most oxidation-number errors here are one of these misremembered.
Q68Marked wrongCounting chelating ligands

In the following ligands how many are chelate ligands? en, C2O42−, H2O, EDTA4−, CO32−

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Given
Five ligands: en, oxalate, water, EDTA4−, carbonate.
Asked
How many of them are chelating ligands.
Concepts

A chelate is a ligand that grips the metal at two or more points and thereby closes a ring. Two conditions, and both are needed: polydentate, and actually forming the ring.

Charge is irrelevant. Carbonate carries 2− just like oxalate, but at NCERT level it is treated as monodentate — one oxygen bound, no ring.

Formula
chelate = polydentate ligand that closes a ring

en bidentate → 5-membered ring
ox bidentate → 5-membered ring
EDTA hexadentate → five rings
H2O monodentate → no ring
CO32− monodentate (NCERT) → no ring
Baby steps
  1. en — two N donors, closes a five-membered ring. Chelate.
  2. Oxalate — two O donors, closes a five-membered ring. Chelate.
  3. H2O — one donor atom. Cannot chelate.
  4. EDTA4− — six donors (2 N, 4 O), the textbook chelator. Chelate. CO32− is taken as monodentate. Total = 3.
Answer — 3
You marked: 2 — two chelators were correctly identified but one was missed. The likely omission is EDTA, which is the most powerful chelator in the list.
a chelate must bite twice and close a ring — count rings, not chargesenMring closedbidentateC₂O₄²⁻Mring closedbidentateH₂OMno ringmonodentateEDTA⁴⁻Mring closedhexadentateCO₃²⁻Mno ringmonodentate herechelating ligands = en, oxalate, EDTA → 3

Ring closed or not — that is the whole test.

Shortcut
Ask one question of each ligand: can it close a ring? Not "is it charged", not "is it big". Water and ammonia never can; en, oxalate, EDTA and acac always can.
Q69Marked wrongWhich isomerisms a complex shows

[Co(NH3)4(NO2)2]Cl exhibits

  • Linkage isomerism, ionization isomerism and geometrical isomerism
  • Ionisation isomerism, geometrical isomerism and optical isomerism
  • Linkage isomerism, geometrical isomerism and optical isomerism
  • Linkage isomerism, ionization isomerism and optical isomerism
Given
[Co(NH3)4(NO2)2]Cl: four ammines and two nitro ligands inside, one chloride outside.
Asked
Which three kinds of isomerism the complex shows.
Concepts

Check each type against a specific structural feature. Do not judge them as a group.

Linkage needs an ambidentate ligand. NO2 binds through N (nitro) or O (nitrito). ✓

Ionisation needs an exchangeable pair — something inside that could swap with the counter ion. Cl outside can trade with NO2 inside, giving [Co(NH3)4(NO2)Cl]NO2. ✓

Geometrical needs an MA4B2 octahedron. Cis and trans both exist. ✓

Optical needs no plane of symmetry anywhere. With four identical ammines, even the cis form has a mirror plane, so it is achiral. ✗

Formula
linkage ← ambidentate ligand present
ionisation ← counter ion can swap with a ligand
geometrical ← MA4B2 or MA3B3
optical ← no plane of symmetry
Baby steps
  1. Look for an ambidentate ligand: NO2 is there. Linkage ✓
  2. Look outside the bracket: Cl can exchange with an inner NO2. Ionisation ✓
  3. Classify the octahedron: MA4B2, so cis/trans exist. Geometrical ✓
  4. Test for chirality: with four identical NH3, both cis and trans have a mirror plane. Optical ✗. That leaves exactly one option.
Answer — linkage, ionisation and geometrical isomerism
You marked: the option ending in optical isomerism. Linkage and geometrical were both correctly spotted; optical was added and ionisation was dropped. Optical activity is the one to be most sceptical about — it needs a genuine absence of any mirror plane.
[Co(NH₃)₄(NO₂)₂]Cl — test each type separatelylinkageNO₂⁻ is ambidentate:binds through N or Oshown ✓ionisationCl⁻ outside can swapwith NO₂⁻ insideshown ✓geometricalMA₄B₂ octahedral:cis and trans existshown ✓opticalcis form still has amirror plane — achiralnot shown ✗linkage + ionisation + geometricalthree of the four — the option naming optical is the trap

Four tests, four independent structural triggers.

Shortcut
Optical activity in NEET octahedral complexes needs at least two chelate rings (as in [Co(en)2Cl2]+) or a genuinely unsymmetrical donor set. Four identical monodentate ligands almost guarantees a mirror plane — so if you see A4, rule out optical straight away.
Q70Left blankNuclearity of a metal carbonyl

Iron carbonyl, Fe(CO)5, is

  • tetranuclear
  • mononuclear
  • trinuclear
  • dinuclear
Given
The formula Fe(CO)5.
Asked
Its nuclearity.
Concepts

Nuclearity is just the number of metal atoms. Read the formula and count. Fe appears once, so mononuclear.

The five carbonyls are a distraction — they set the coordination number (5, trigonal bipyramidal), not the nuclearity.

For contrast, the other carbonyls NCERT names: Co2(CO)8 is dinuclear, Fe2(CO)9 is dinuclear, and Fe3(CO)12 or Co4(CO)12 are poly-nuclear.

Formula
nuclearity = number of metal atoms in the formula

Fe(CO)5 → 1 Fe → mononuclear
Co2(CO)8 → 2 Co → dinuclear
Baby steps
  1. Count the metal atoms in Fe(CO)5: one.
  2. One metal atom → mononuclear.
  3. Do not let the subscript 5 pull you toward another answer — it counts ligands.
  4. Shape, for completeness: trigonal bipyramidal, dsp³, diamagnetic.
Answer — mononuclear
Animation / diagram
Not needed — this one is pure recall.
Shortcut
The subscript on the metal is the nuclearity. No subscript means one, means mononuclear. The ligand subscript is never the answer to this question.
Q72Marked wrongInner vs outer orbital, and magnetism

Statement I: [TiF6]3− is an inner orbital complex and paramagnetic complex with 1 unpaired electron.
Statement II: [Co(NH3)6]3+ is an outer orbital complex and a paramagnetic complex.

  • If both statements, I and II, are correct.
  • If both statements, I and statement II, are incorrect.
  • If statement I correct, but statement II is incorrect.
  • If statement I incorrect, but statement II is correct.
Given
Two complexes: [TiF6]3− and [Co(NH3)6]3+. Ti = 22, Co = 27.
Asked
Whether each statement is correct.
Concepts

Statement I. Ti in [TiF6]3− is +3, so . That single electron goes into t2g, leaving two d orbitals free for d²sp³ hybridisation — inner orbital. One unpaired electron, so paramagnetic. Both claims correct.

Note that F being a weak-field ligand does not matter here. Weak versus strong only decides how electrons distribute when there is a choice, and with there is none.

Statement II. Co(III) is d⁶ and NH3 is strong-field, so all six electrons pair in t2g. That gives d²sp³ — inner orbital, not outer — and zero unpaired electrons, so diamagnetic, not paramagnetic. Wrong on both counts.

Formula
inner orbital = d2sp3 (inner 3d used)
outer orbital = sp3d2 (outer 4d used)

μ = √(n(n+2)) BM, n = unpaired electrons
Baby steps
  1. Statement I: Ti(III) → → one unpaired → paramagnetic; two empty d orbitals available → inner orbital. Correct.
  2. Statement II: Co(III) → d⁶; NH3 strong field → t2g⁶eg.
  3. That configuration is inner orbital (d²sp³) and has n = 0, so diamagnetic. The statement says outer and paramagnetic — both wrong.
  4. I correct, II incorrect.
Answer — Statement I is correct, Statement II is incorrect
You marked: “both incorrect”. Statement II was rightly rejected, but Statement I was rejected too. With only one d electron there is nothing to pair or unpair, so d¹ is paramagnetic and inner-orbital regardless of the ligand.
judge each statement on its own d-count and field strength[TiF₆]³⁻ Ti(III), d¹eᵍt₂ᵍd²sp³, inner orbitalunpaired = 1paramagnetic ✓[Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ Co(III), d⁶eᵍt₂ᵍd²sp³, inner orbitalunpaired = 0diamagnetic, not para ✗Statement I is correctStatement II is wrong on both counts

Each complex judged from its own d-count and ligand field.

Shortcut
[Co(NH3)6]3+ is the standard textbook example of an inner-orbital, diamagnetic complex — worth knowing on sight, since it recurs across papers. And remember: any , or ion is inner-orbital whatever the ligand.
Q73Left blankNaming an isomer from a bond angle

In a particular isomer of [Co(NH3)4Cl2], the Cl–Co–Cl angle is 90°. The isomer is known as

  • optical isomer
  • cis-isomer
  • position isomer
  • linkage isomer
Given
An octahedral complex [Co(NH3)4Cl2] in which the two chlorides subtend 90° at the metal.
Asked
The name of that isomer.
Concepts

On an octahedron there are only two possible angles between two ligands: 90° (adjacent) or 180° (opposite). No third value exists, which is exactly why only cis and trans exist.

90° = adjacent = cis. 180° = opposite = trans. The question is a vocabulary check dressed as geometry.

Formula
octahedral geometry:
  90° → adjacent → cis
  180° → opposite → trans
Baby steps
  1. Recognise the geometry: six ligands around Co(III) → octahedral.
  2. List the only two possible ligand–ligand angles: 90° and 180°.
  3. 90° means the two chlorides are next to each other.
  4. Adjacent identical ligands → cis.
Answer — cis-isomer
the Cl–Co–Cl angle tells you which isomer you are looking atMClNH₃NH₃NH₃NH₃Clcis — angle 90°MClClNH₃NH₃NH₃NH₃trans — angle 180°90° means adjacent, and adjacent means cis

The two possible chloride placements and the angle each produces.

Shortcut
"Cis" and "90°" mean the same thing on an octahedron, as do "trans" and "180°". Substitute the words for the numbers as soon as you read the question.
Q77Left blankWriting a formula from an IUPAC name

Tetrammine diaqua copper (II) hydroxide is given by the formula

  • [Cu(NH3)4](OH)2·2H2O
  • [Cu(NH3)4(OH)2]·2H2O
  • [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2](OH)2
  • [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)(OH)2]
Given
The name tetrammine diaqua copper(II) hydroxide.
Asked
The corresponding formula.
Concepts

Read an IUPAC name as a set of instructions, left to right:

tetrammine = 4 NH3, a ligand, so inside the bracket. diaqua = 2 H2O, also a ligand, also inside. copper(II) = Cu2+, the central metal. hydroxide is named after the metal as a separate word — that makes it the counter ion, outside the bracket.

The rule that decides this question: anything named as a separate word after the metal is outside the coordination sphere. Ligands are prefixes joined to the metal name.

Charge check: Cu is +2, both ligands are neutral, so the complex ion is 2+ and needs two OH outside.

Formula
prefixed to the metal → ligand, inside [ ]
separate word after → counter ion, outside

aqua = H2O (neutral), hydroxo = OH (inside)
hydroxide = OH (outside)
Baby steps
  1. Collect the ligands: 4 NH3 and 2 H2O, both inside the bracket → [Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂].
  2. “Hydroxide” is a separate word after the metal, so it is the counter ion, outside.
  3. Balance the charge: Cu²⁺ with neutral ligands gives a 2+ ion, needing 2 OH.
  4. [Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂](OH)₂. Note the distractors write water as ·2H₂O, which is water of crystallisation, a different thing entirely from an aqua ligand.
Answer — [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2](OH)2
Animation / diagram
Not needed — this one is pure recall.
Shortcut
“Aqua” in the name always means a coordinated water inside the bracket. Any option showing ·2H₂O hanging off the end has demoted it to water of crystallisation and can be eliminated on sight.
Q78Left blankGeometrical isomerism in square planar complexes

Which of the following types of square-planar complexes can show geometrical isomers?

  • Ma4
  • Ma3b
  • Ma2b2
  • Mab3
Given
Square planar complexes of the types Ma4, Ma3b, Ma2b2 and Mab3.
Asked
Which type shows geometrical isomerism.
Concepts

In a square plane every position is equivalent to every other by rotation, so isomerism only appears when there is a genuine choice of relative placement.

With one odd ligand (Ma3b or Mab3), wherever you put it the other three fill the rest — rotate the molecule and every arrangement looks the same. One structure only.

With two of each, the pair can sit adjacent (cis) or opposite (trans), and no rotation converts one into the other. Two distinct compounds.

Formula
square planar Ma2b2 → cis and trans
square planar Ma2bc → cis and trans
square planar Mabcd → three isomers

Ma4, Ma3b, Mab3 → one structure only
Baby steps
  1. Ma4: all four identical, nothing to arrange. One structure.
  2. Ma3b: the single b has no distinguishable position. One structure.
  3. Mab3: same argument with the roles swapped. One structure.
  4. Ma2b2: the two b's are either adjacent (cis) or opposite (trans) → two isomers. Cisplatin and transplatin are exactly this case.
Answer — Ma2b2
square planar: only Ma₂b₂ gives two distinct arrangementsMaaaaMa₄all positions alikeMbaaaMa₃bone b — nowhere else to put itMbbaaMa₂b₂b's adjacent = cisMbabaMa₂b₂b's opposite = transonly Ma₂b₂ shows geometrical isomerism

Only the two-and-two split admits more than one arrangement.

Shortcut
You need at least two pairs, or two different odd ligands, before geometrical isomerism is possible. Any type with a lone odd ligand (Ma3b, Mab3) can be crossed out without thinking.
Q80Left blankRanking crystal field splitting

In which of the following octahedral complexes of cobalt (At. No. 27) is the magnitude of Δ0 the highest?

  • [Co(CN)6]3−
  • [Co(C2O4)3]3−
  • [Co(H2O)6]3+
  • [Co(NH3)6]3+
Given
Four octahedral Co(III) complexes differing only in the ligand: CN, oxalate, H2O, NH3.
Asked
Which has the largest crystal field splitting energy.
Concepts

Every one of these is Co(III), octahedral, d⁶. Metal, oxidation state and geometry are all identical, so the ligand alone decides Δ0. That is the question telling you which variable to look at.

The spectrochemical series ranks ligands by field strength. The order to hold in memory, weak to strong:

I⁻ < Br⁻ < Cl⁻ < F⁻ < OH⁻ < C₂O₄²⁻ < H₂O < NH₃ < en < NO₂⁻ < CN⁻ < CO

CN sits at the strong end, second only to CO.

Formula
Δ0 depends on:
  ligand field strength (spectrochemical series)
  metal oxidation state (higher → larger)
  period (3d < 4d < 5d)

here only the ligand varies
Baby steps
  1. Confirm what is constant: Co(III), octahedral, d⁶ in all four options.
  2. Place each ligand on the series: oxalate < H2O < NH3 < CN.
  3. The strongest field gives the largest splitting.
  4. [Co(CN)₆]³⁻ has the highest Δ0.
Answer — [Co(CN)6]3−
spectrochemical series — weak field on the left, strong on the rightI⁻Br⁻Cl⁻F⁻H₂OC₂O₄²⁻NH₃enNO₂⁻CN⁻small Δ₀large Δ₀[Co(CN)₆]³⁻ winssame metal, same oxidation state, same geometry → only the ligand decides

Only the ligand varies, so only its place on the series matters.

Shortcut
Learn the two ends and ignore the middle: CO and CN are the strongest; the halides are the weakest. That answers almost every Δ0 comparison NEET asks, since papers rarely test the crowded middle of the series.
Q84Marked wrongMatch the column · shape and magnetic moment

Match LIST-I (complex/species) with LIST-II (shape and magnetic moment). A. [Ni(CO)4]   B. [Ni(CN)4]2−   C. [NiCl4]2−   D. [MnBr4]2−   |   I. Tetrahedral, 2.8 BM   II. Square planar, 0 BM   III. Tetrahedral, 0 BM   IV. Tetrahedral, 5.9 BM

  • A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
  • A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
  • A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV
  • A-IV, B-I, C-III, D-II
Given
Four four-coordinate complexes and four shape/moment descriptions.
Asked
The correct pairing.
Concepts

Do not match by elimination. Work out shape and moment for each complex independently, write them down, and only then look at List-II.

A [Ni(CO)4] — CO is neutral, so Ni is 0, 3d¹⁰4s². CO is a strong field ligand: the 4s electrons shift into 3d, giving 3d¹⁰ — completely filled, so sp³ tetrahedral, 0 BM.

B [Ni(CN)4]2− — Ni(II), d⁸. CN is strong, so the two unpaired d electrons pair up, freeing one 3d orbital: dsp² square planar, 0 BM.

C [NiCl4]2− — also Ni(II), d⁸, but Cl is weak, so no pairing. Two unpaired electrons: sp³ tetrahedral, μ = √8 = 2.832.8 BM.

D [MnBr4]2− — Mn(II), d⁵, Br weak. Five unpaired: tetrahedral, μ = √35 = 5.925.9 BM.

Formula
μ = √(n(n+2)) BM

n = 0 → 0 BM    n = 1 → 1.73 BM
n = 2 → 2.83 BM  n = 3 → 3.87 BM
n = 4 → 4.90 BM  n = 5 → 5.92 BM
Baby steps
  1. Get the oxidation state and d-count for each: Ni(0) d10, Ni(II) d8, Ni(II) d8, Mn(II) d5.
  2. Classify each ligand as strong or weak: CO strong, CN strong, Cl weak, Br weak.
  3. Count unpaired electrons: 0, 0, 2, 5. Convert with √(n(n+2)): 0, 0, 2.83, 5.92 BM.
  4. Now match. The two 0 BM entries are separated by shape — A is tetrahedral (III), B is square planar (II). So A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV.
Answer — A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV
You marked: A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV — B and D were right, and A and C were swapped. [Ni(CO)4] is the diamagnetic one (0 BM) and [NiCl4]2− is the 2.8 BM one, not the reverse.
work out shape and moment first, then match — never the other waycomplexmetalconfigunpairedshapeμA[Ni(CO)₄]Ni(0)d¹⁰0tetrahedral0 BMIIIB[Ni(CN)₄]²⁻Ni(II)d⁸0square planar0 BMIIC[NiCl₄]²⁻Ni(II)d⁸2tetrahedral2.8 BMID[MnBr₄]²⁻Mn(II)d⁵5tetrahedral5.9 BMIVA–III, B–II, C–I, D–IVrows A and C were swapped — B and D were already right

Every row solved independently before any matching is attempted.

Shortcut
The 5.9 BM row is unmistakable — only d⁵ high-spin reaches it, so D-IV is free. Then the two zeros are told apart by shape alone. Anchor on the unique values first and the ambiguous rows shrink.
Q88Left blankIdentifying diamagnetic complexes

Identify the diamagnetic octahedral complex ions from below: A. [Mn(CN)6]3−   B. [Co(NH3)6]3+   C. [Fe(CN)6]4−   D. [Co(H2O)3F3]

  • B and D only
  • A and D only
  • A and C only
  • B and C only
Given
Four octahedral complexes with varying metals, oxidation states and ligand fields.
Asked
Which are diamagnetic.
Concepts

Diamagnetic means zero unpaired electrons. Three things decide it, in this order: the oxidation state (giving the d-count), the ligand field strength, and then the filling.

A Mn(III), d⁴, CN strong → t2g: one orbital holds a lone electron, and a second holds another. 2 unpaired, paramagnetic.

B Co(III), d⁶, NH3 strong → t2g⁶eg. 0 unpaired, diamagnetic. ✓

C Fe(II), d⁶, CN strong → same filling. 0 unpaired, diamagnetic. ✓

D Co(III), d⁶, but H2O and F are both weak → high spin t2g⁴eg². 4 unpaired, paramagnetic.

Formula
strong field → low spin → pair up in t2g first
weak field → high spin → fill all five singly first

d6 low spin → n = 0 (diamagnetic)
d6 high spin → n = 4 (paramagnetic)
Baby steps
  1. Fix the oxidation state and d-count for each: Mn(III) d4, Co(III) d6, Fe(II) d6, Co(III) d6.
  2. Classify each ligand set: CN strong, NH3 strong, CN strong, H2O/F weak.
  3. Only d⁶ with a strong field reaches zero unpaired — that rules A out (wrong d-count) and D out (wrong field).
  4. B and C both qualify.
Answer — B and C only
diamagnetic means every electron paired → unpaired = 0A [Mn(CN)₆]³⁻ d⁴eᵍt₂ᵍCN⁻ strongunpaired = 2paramagnetic ✗B [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ d⁶eᵍt₂ᵍNH₃ strongunpaired = 0diamagnetic ✓C [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ d⁶eᵍt₂ᵍCN⁻ strongunpaired = 0diamagnetic ✓D [Co(H₂O)₃F₃] d⁶eᵍt₂ᵍH₂O, F⁻ weakunpaired = 4paramagnetic ✗B and C only

Only low-spin d⁶ empties every unpaired slot.

Shortcut
For octahedral complexes, diamagnetic almost always means low-spin d6 (and occasionally d8 square planar). Scan the options for d⁶ plus a strong ligand and you can usually skip drawing anything.
Q89Left blankChelation therapy

The compound used in the treatment of lead poisoning is

  • Desferrioxime B
  • Cis-platin
  • EDTA
  • D-Pencillamine
Given
Four coordination compounds with biological or medical roles.
Asked
Which one treats lead poisoning.
Concepts

This is straight NCERT recall of the applications section, and the four compounds pair with four different metals:

  • EDTA — lead poisoning. Given as Ca-EDTA; the calcium is displaced by the more strongly bound Pb2+, which is then excreted.
  • D-penicillamine — copper poisoning, and Wilson's disease.
  • Desferrioxime B — iron overload.
  • Cis-platin — not a chelating agent at all; it is an anti-tumour drug that binds DNA.

The principle behind all three chelators is the same: a ligand that binds the toxic metal far more strongly than the body's own ligands do, forming a stable water-soluble complex that the kidneys can clear.

Formula
chelation therapy:
  lead → EDTA
  copper → D-penicillamine
  iron → desferrioxime B
Baby steps
  1. Recognise cis-platin as the odd one out: an anti-cancer drug, not a chelator. Eliminate.
  2. Desferrioxime B is the iron chelator. Eliminate.
  3. D-penicillamine is the copper chelator. Eliminate.
  4. EDTA is left, and is indeed the lead antidote.
Answer — EDTA (as its calcium salt)
chelating agents in medicine — match the drug to the metalEDTAleadPb²⁺D-penicillaminecopperCu²⁺desferrioxime BironFe³⁺cis-platinnot a chelatoranti-tumour druglead poisoning → EDTA

Three chelating drugs, three different target metals.

Shortcut
Two of the names carry their own hint: desferrioxime has iron (ferrum) in the word. EDTA is the general-purpose chelator, so it takes the general-purpose heavy metal, lead.
Q90Left blankCharge on a coordination entity

Coordination entity in a complex compound can be

  • always neutral
  • always anionic
  • always cationic
  • may be neutral, cationic and anionic
Given
The general question of what charge a coordination entity can carry.
Asked
Which statement is true.
Concepts

The charge on a coordination entity is simply the metal's oxidation state plus the charges of its ligands. Nothing constrains that sum to a sign.

One example of each is enough to kill the three "always" options:

  • Cationic — [Co(NH3)6]3+: +3 with six neutral ligands.
  • Anionic — [Fe(CN)6]4−: +2 − 6 = −4.
  • Neutral — [Ni(CO)4]: metal at 0 with neutral ligands. Also [Pt(NH3)2Cl2], +2 − 2 = 0.
Formula
charge on entity = oxidation state of metal
                + Σ ligand charges
Baby steps
  1. Test “always neutral” against [Co(NH3)6]3+. Fails.
  2. Test “always anionic” against the same example. Fails.
  3. Test “always cationic” against [Fe(CN)6]4−. Fails.
  4. All three sign restrictions are refuted, so the inclusive option is correct.
Answer — may be neutral, cationic or anionic
Animation / diagram
Not needed — this one is pure recall.
Shortcut
Any option containing “always”, “never” or “only” in a conceptual chemistry question is usually wrong. One counter-example is enough, and in this chapter a counter-example is always close to hand.