Match-the-column: the outer rows keep getting swappedrecurring
Q84 — and Q151 in Zoology on the same paper
In Q84 the pairing chosen was A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV. B and D were right; A and C were exchanged. In Q151 the pairing chosen was A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV again — and again B and C were right while A and D were exchanged.
Twice in one paper, in different subjects, with the middle rows correct and the outer rows crossed. Notice that both wrong answers were the straight-down A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV option. That is not a chemistry error; it is the sequential option being picked when the matching is not finished.
Fix to drill. Never read List-II until List-I is fully worked. Write your own four conclusions in the margin, cover the options, then look. If the option you land on is the tidy A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV one, re-derive at least two rows before committing — setters put that option in deliberately.
Optical isomerism is being over-awardedrecurring
Q69, and the mirror image of it in Q54
Q69: optical isomerism was included for [Co(NH3)4(NO2)2]Cl, which has a mirror plane in both its cis and trans forms.
Q54: the assertion claimed three geometrical isomers, and it was accepted. Three is the count of stereoisomers, once the cis d/l pair is included — so the same confusion between the two categories appears in both questions, once by adding optical where it does not belong and once by folding it into a geometrical count.
Fix to drill. Before ticking optical, name the symmetry element that is absent. If you cannot say which mirror plane is missing, the complex is achiral. As a working rule for NEET: octahedral optical activity needs two or more chelate rings.
Ten of seventeen left blank, several of them one-linersattempt rate
Q46, 57, 70, 73, 77, 78, 80, 88, 89, 90
Q70 (nuclearity of Fe(CO)5), Q73 (90° means cis), Q89 (EDTA for lead) and Q90 (entities can be any charge) are pure recall, answerable in seconds. Q80 needs only the two ends of the spectrochemical series.
Coordination Compounds is one of the highest-yield chapters in the paper — seventeen questions here — and it rewards recall more than calculation. Leaving the recall questions blank costs more here than in any other chapter.
Fix to drill. Split the blanks into two lists: recall (Q57, 70, 73, 77, 89, 90) and reasoning (Q46, 78, 80, 88). Do the recall six as flashcards this week, and the reasoning four as a timed set.
Denticity and charge of the standard ligandsrecurring
Q64, Q68
Q64 gave 8 instead of 9, which means the coordination number was right but the oxidation number was +2 instead of +3 — consistent with oxalate being taken as −1.
Q68 gave 2 instead of 3, one chelator short.
Both are the same underlying gap: the standing table of ligand denticity and charge is not yet automatic, and almost every calculation in this chapter starts from it.
Fix to drill. Build a single reference card: ligand, formula, denticity, charge, chelating yes/no. Nine rows covers it — NH3, H2O, Cl−, CN−, NO2−, en, ox, EDTA, acac. Recite it before every coordination practice set until it needs no thought.
Assertion-and-reason, again in both directionsrecurring
Q54, Q72
Q54: the true verdict is A false, R true; the exact opposite was marked. Q72: the true verdict is I correct, II incorrect; “both incorrect” was marked.
Q72 is the more informative of the two. Statement II was judged correctly, which means the chemistry was available — but that verdict appears to have spilled over onto Statement I, which is independently true. The Physics paper shows the identical pattern in Q15 and Q44.
Fix to drill. The same three-step written defence used in Physics applies here without change: write the verdict on A and its one-line reason; write the verdict on B and its one-line reason; only then read the options. Four assertion-reason errors across two subjects on one paper makes this the highest-value habit to fix.