Every biology question flagged on this paper, rebuilt in full. Each one carries what was given, what was asked, the concept behind it, the rule, the steps written out, a table justifying the right option and ruling out each of the others, the fastest route through, and an animated figure wherever seeing the thing settles the answer.
10Questions reviewed
7Attempted, wrong
1Left blank
1Attempted, correct
The shape of this paper
Ten questions: seven attempted and missed, one left blank, one answered correctly, and one
(Q1) whose screenshot was cropped before the options.
The attempt rate is high — eight of the nine that show an answer were attempted. What
this paper exposes is something narrower than a knowledge gap: four of the seven wrong
answers are about Mendel's experimental method, and they form a single cluster that is much
easier to learn together than separately.
Red = attempted and missed · Amber = left blank · Green = attempted and correct · Grey = marked answer not captured
Principles of Inheritance and Variation
7 wrong · 1 blank
Ten questions, and eight of them concern Mendel's method rather than his results — which plants he used, how many, over how many generations, and why any of that made his conclusions believable.
Q 1Marked answer not capturedMatch · basic genetic vocabulary
Marked answer not capturedThis screenshot was cropped below the table, so the option list and the selection are not visible. The worked matching is below; check your own paper for what was marked.
Match List I with List II. A) Genes I) Unit of inheritance B) Homozygous II) Genetic composition of an organism C) Genotype III) Physical appearance of an organism D) Phenotype IV) Recessive trait
CorrectA–I, B–IV, C–II, D–III
Given
Four terms: genes, homozygous, genotype, phenotype.
Four descriptions to match them to.
Asked
The correct matching.
Concept to use
Three of the four are definitions you can place directly. A gene is the unit of inheritance. A genotype is the genetic make-up. A phenotype is the outward appearance. That leaves homozygous with the remaining item, and the link is that a recessive trait can only show when the individual is homozygous for it.
DiagramAnimatedThe vocabulary of a cross, laid out where each term applies.
Formula to usegene = unit · genotype = what it IS · phenotype = what it LOOKS like
Baby steps
A. Genes — Mendel's “factors”, the units passed from parent to offspring. A–I.
C. Genotype — the alleles an organism carries, e.g. Tt. C–II.
D. Phenotype — what you can see, e.g. tall. D–III.
B. Homozygous takes the only item left, IV. The connection is real: a recessive trait appears only in the homozygous recessive condition. B–IV.
Answer
A–I, B–IV, C–II, D–III
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
A-I, B-IV, C-II, D-III
keep
Three definitions place themselves, and the fourth follows by elimination with a genuine link behind it.
Shortcut
In a four-by-four match, place the obvious ones first and let the awkward pairing fall out by elimination. Genotype and phenotype are near-opposites and both appear here, so pinning those two immediately halves the work. The tricky item is never the one to start with.
Q 5Attempted · wrongWho developed the Punnett square
Punnett square was developed by
Her answerBritish Zoologist, Reginald C. Punnett
German Botanist, Reginald C. Punnett
Stanford Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
CorrectBritish Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
Given
Reginald C. Punnett, the originator of the Punnett square.
The four options differ only in his nationality and discipline.
Asked
The correct description of Punnett.
Concept to use
Every option carries the same name, so the question is entirely about two attributes: his nationality and his field. He was British, and he was a geneticist — a founder of modern genetics, and a collaborator of William Bateson, who coined the word “genetics”.
DiagramAnimatedThe tool itself — and the field it belongs to.
Formula to useReginald C. Punnett — British GENETICIST
Baby steps
Two options say British and two do not, so nationality halves the field.
German is wrong, and Stanford is an American university, so those two go.
Of the two British options, one says zoologist and one says geneticist.
Punnett was a geneticist, so the last option is correct.
Answer
British Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
British Zoologist
rule out
The nationality is right but the discipline is not. Punnett worked on inheritance, not on animal biology generally.
German Botanist
rule out
Wrong on both counts. The German botanist associated with the rediscovery of Mendel's work is Carl Correns.
Stanford Geneticist
rule out
The discipline is right but he was British and worked at Cambridge, not Stanford.
British Geneticist
keep
Both attributes correct.
Shortcut
When every option shares a name, the question is a two-attribute check, so test one attribute at a time. Nationality first cuts the list in half in about two seconds, and only then do you need to know his field. Rushing straight at the whole phrase is what makes these feel like guesswork.
Where it went wrong
“British” was correct and “zoologist” was not. The two remaining options differ by a single word, which is the classic shape of this trap: the paper gets you to the last pair and then tests one specific fact. Given that Punnett squares belong to genetics, the discipline is recoverable from the topic itself — the tool tells you the field.
Q 10Attempted · wrongMendel's method · two statements
Statement I: Mendel selected 14 true breeding pea plant varieties, as pairs which were similar except for one character with contrasting traits. Statement II: The Mendel experiments has a large sampling size which gave greater credibility to the data.
CorrectBoth statement I and statement II are correct.
Both statement I and statement II are incorrect.
Statement I is correct, statement II is incorrect.
Her answerStatement I is incorrect, statement II is correct.
Given
Statement I about the 14 varieties Mendel selected.
Statement II about his large sample size.
Asked
The truth of each statement.
Concept to use
Both statements are straight out of NCERT. Mendel studied seven contrasting characters, and each character needed two true-breeding varieties — one for each trait. Seven pairs is 14 varieties, which is exactly what statement I says. Statement II names one of the two things that made his conclusions trustworthy, the other being observation over several generations.
DiagramAnimatedSeven characters, two varieties each, and thousands of plants.
Formula to use7 characters × 2 contrasting varieties each → 14 true-breeding lines
Baby steps
Mendel worked with seven pairs of contrasting characters — tall/dwarf, round/wrinkled, and so on.
Each pair needed two true-breeding lines, one showing each trait.
7 × 2 = 14 varieties. Statement I is correct.
Statement II: Mendel counted thousands of plants, and that large sample is precisely what raised his work above anecdote. Correct.
Both statements stand.
Answer
Both statement I and statement II are correct
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
Both correct
keep
7 pairs of characters means 14 varieties, and the large sample size is the standard NCERT point about his credibility.
Both incorrect
rule out
Neither contains an error.
I correct, II incorrect
rule out
Statement II is the well-known reason his results were taken seriously.
I incorrect, II correct
rule out
Statement I is right — the number 14 comes from 7 characters × 2 varieties, and it is easy to mistake for an error if you are holding only the number 7.
Shortcut
The number to hold is 7 characters, 14 varieties. Both figures appear in questions and they are easy to confuse, but one is simply twice the other, and knowing why makes them impossible to mix up: you cannot show a contrast with only one line.
Where it went wrong
Statement I was rejected, almost certainly because the number 7 is the one most strongly attached to Mendel and 14 looked wrong. But 7 counts the characters and 14 counts the varieties, and both numbers are correct in their own context. When a familiar number appears in an unfamiliar form, the question to ask is counting what? rather than assuming an error.
In pea plants, tallness (T) is dominant over dwarfness (t). When heterozygous tall plants (Tt) are crossed with homozygous recessive dwarf plants (tt), 100 offspring are produced. How many plants will be homozygous dwarf (tt), heterozygous tall (Tt), and homozygous tall (TT)?
The dwarf parent is tt and can only ever give a t. So every single offspring receives a t from that side, and no offspring can possibly be TT — there is no second T available anywhere in the cross. The Tt parent supplies T or t equally, which splits the offspring evenly into Tt and tt.
DiagramAnimatedTt × tt: the dwarf parent supplies only t, so TT is impossible.
Formula to useTt × tt → Tt : tt = 1 : 1 , TT = 0
Baby steps
The tt parent produces only t gametes.
The Tt parent produces T and t gametes in equal numbers.
Combining: T × t gives Tt, and t × t gives tt.
So the offspring are 50%% Tt and 50%% tt.
Of 100 offspring: 50 tt, 50 Tt, and 0 TT. TT is impossible because only one parent carries a T at all.
Would require the dwarf parent to give a T, which it cannot — it is tt.
100 dwarf, 0 Tt, 0 TT
rule out
Would require the tall parent to give only t, ignoring half its gametes.
25 dwarf, 50 Tt, 25 TT
rule out
This is the 1 : 2 : 1 result of Tt × Tt, a different cross. It also produces TT offspring, which this cross cannot.
50 dwarf, 50 Tt, 0 TT
keep
A 1 : 1 split, with no TT possible because only one parent carries T.
Shortcut
Ask one question before anything else: can a TT offspring exist? It needs a T from each parent, and the dwarf parent has none. So any option showing TT offspring is dead immediately — which removes the main distractor here without a single calculation.
Where it went wrong
The 1 : 2 : 1 pattern was applied, and that belongs to Tt × Tt, not to Tt × tt. This is the same cross-confusion that appeared as Q2 on the ILTS-05 paper, where 25% was given for a test cross that should have been 50%. The distinguishing step is always to read the second parent first: if it is homozygous, the answer is a 1 : 1 split and one genotype is impossible; if it is heterozygous, you get 1 : 2 : 1.
Q 15Attempted · wrongWhy Mendel chose the pea plant
Mendel conducted artificial pollination/cross-pollination experiments using several true-breeding pea lines. Mendel chose the pea plant for his investigations for the following reasons: a) A pea is naturally self-pollinating but can be easily cross-pollinated. b) The characters in the garden pea plant are manifested as two opposing traits, e.g., tall or dwarf plants. c) In less space, more plants can be grown. d) Life span is short, hence many generations can be observed.
a, b and c are only correct
Her answera, b and d are only correct
b, c and d are only correct
Correcta, b, c and d are correct
Given
Four stated reasons for choosing the garden pea.
Asked
Which reasons are correct.
Concept to use
All four are genuine, and each solves a different practical problem. (a) gives control — self-pollination keeps lines pure, while hand cross-pollination lets him make the crosses he wants. (b) gives clear data — traits that are either one thing or the other, with no middle ground to argue about. (c) gives numbers — large samples in a small garden. (d) gives generations — results within a season rather than a lifetime.
DiagramAnimatedFour practical reasons, each solving a different problem.
Formula to usecontrol (a) + clear traits (b) + large numbers (c) + fast generations (d)
Baby steps
(a) Peas self-pollinate naturally, which maintains true-breeding lines without effort, and the flower structure still allows deliberate crossing. Correct.
(b) Seven characters each appear in two sharply distinct forms — no blending, no judgement calls. Correct.
(c) A small plant means many individuals in a monastery garden, which is what made his large sample possible. Correct.
(d) A short life cycle meant he could follow F₁, F₂ and beyond within a few years. Correct.
All four stand.
Answer
a, b, c and d are correct
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
a, b, c only
rule out
Drops (d), but the short life cycle is one of the most frequently cited reasons of all.
a, b, d only
rule out
Drops (c). Growing many plants in a small space is what produced the large sample size that Q10 on this same paper praises.
b, c, d only
rule out
Drops (a), which is arguably the single most important reason — without controllable pollination there is no experiment at all.
a, b, c and d
keep
Every one of the four is a standard NCERT reason.
Shortcut
When a stem lists four plausible reasons and offers “all of them” as an option, check whether any one can actually be disproved rather than merely looking less important. Here none can. NCERT lists all four, and “all of the above” is the right answer far more often in this chapter than instinct suggests.
Where it went wrong
Reason (c) was dropped, presumably as the least memorable of the four. But it is doing real work: a small plant is what allowed thousands of individuals to be grown and counted, and that large sample is exactly what Q10 and Q17 on this same paper identify as the source of Mendel's credibility. Three questions on this paper turn on the same cluster of facts about his method, so it is worth learning as one block rather than as separate items.
Q 17Attempted · wrongWhy Mendel's results were believed
Which of the following approaches by Mendel helps to prove that his results pointed to general rules of inheritance rather than being unsubstantiated ideas?
use of large sample size in experiments
confirmation of his inferences from experiments on successive generations
Her answerstatistical analysis and mathematical logic were applied
Correctlarge sampling size and several generations of observation
Given
Four candidate features of Mendel's approach.
Asked
Which approach established his results as general rules.
Concept to use
Two things together made his results convincing, and NCERT names them as a pair: a large sample size, which rules out coincidence, and observation over several generations, which shows the pattern repeats rather than being a one-off. Either alone is weaker than both together, and the option list is built so that one option contains both.
DiagramAnimatedLarge samples and repeated generations — the two together.
Formula to uselarge samples (rules out chance) + several generations (rules out a one-off)
Baby steps
A large sample means the ratios are statistically reliable rather than accidental.
Repeating across generations shows the same ratios reappear predictably.
Options 1 and 2 each name one of these, so each is true but incomplete.
Option 4 names both, and is therefore the fullest answer.
Option 3 mentions statistical analysis, which Mendel did use — but it is a consequence of having large samples, not the approach itself, and it is not the phrase NCERT uses here.
Answer
Large sampling size and several generations of observation
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
large sample size
rule out
True, but only half of the pair. A large sample in a single generation could still be a fluke of that one cross.
confirmation over successive generations
rule out
Also true, and also only half.
statistical analysis and mathematical logic
rule out
He did keep careful counts, but this describes his handling of the data rather than the design of the experiments, and it is not the NCERT wording.
large sampling size and several generations
keep
Both halves together, which is exactly how NCERT states it.
Shortcut
When two options are each individually true and a third option combines them, the combined option is nearly always intended. Scan the list for overlap before choosing, because a question asking what made results convincing is asking for the full case, not one strand of it.
Where it went wrong
“Statistical analysis and mathematical logic” sounds like the most rigorous option, and rigour is what the question seems to be asking about — which is exactly why it is offered. But the two features NCERT names are the sample size and the repetition across generations, and one option contains both. Noticing that options 1 and 2 are each halves of option 4 would have pointed straight at it.
Q 25Attempted · wrongWhat a Punnett square shows
Which of the following can be understood/identified using a Punnett square? i) Types of gametes produced from parental genotype ii) Genotypes of zygotes formed iii) Genotypes of F₁ and F₂ generations iv) Phenotypes of F₁ and F₂ generations
(i), (ii) and (iii) only
(ii), (iii) and (iv) only
Her answer(i), (iii) and (iv) only
Correct(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
Given
Four things a Punnett square might show.
Asked
Which of them it can show.
Concept to use
A Punnett square is built from the gametes — they are the row and column headings — and the boxes inside are the genotypes of the zygotes. So (i) and (ii) are not merely visible in it, they are its two structural halves. Run the square a second time on the F₁ and you get the F₂ genotypes too, and reading dominance off those genotypes gives the phenotypes. All four.
DiagramAnimatedEverything the square contains, by construction.
Formula to useheadings = gametes · boxes = genotypes · dominance = phenotypes
Baby steps
(i) The headings along the top and side are the gamete types. You cannot draw the square without identifying them. Yes.
(ii) Each box holds the genotype of a possible zygote. That is what the square is for. Yes.
(iii) One square gives F₁; selfing the F₁ and drawing a second square gives F₂. Yes.
(iv) Apply the dominance relationship to each genotype and the phenotypes follow immediately. Yes.
All four.
Answer
(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
(i), (ii), (iii)
rule out
Drops phenotypes, but they are read straight off the genotypes.
(ii), (iii), (iv)
rule out
Drops the gametes, which are literally the headings of the square.
(i), (iii), (iv)
rule out
Drops the genotypes of the zygotes — the contents of every box. This is the least defensible omission of the three.
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)
keep
The square contains all four, by construction.
Shortcut
Picture the square itself and point at each item: the headings are the gametes, the boxes are the genotypes, running it twice gives F₂, and dominance converts genotypes to phenotypes. If you can point at it on the diagram, it belongs in the answer — and here you can point at all four.
Where it went wrong
Item (ii), the genotypes of the zygotes, was dropped — and that is the one thing the square most obviously does, since the genotypes are written inside the boxes. It looks like (ii) and (iii) were read as saying the same thing, with one of them discarded as redundant. They are not the same: (ii) is about zygotes in general and (iii) is about specific generations. In an “all of these” question, treat each item on its own merits rather than looking for overlap.
Q 38Attempted · wrongStatements about alleles and genes
Choose the correct statement. I) Alleles do not blend with each other. II) Alleles are units of inheritance and slightly different from the same genes. III) Mendel's laws did not provide any proof for the existence of genes. IV) Genes are independent pairs segregated independent of each other.
CorrectI, II, and IV only
I, II, and III only
I, III, and IV only
Her answerII, III, and IV only
Given
Four statements about alleles, genes and Mendel's laws.
Asked
Which statements are correct.
Concept to use
Statements I, II and IV are all standard. Statement III is the planted one: Mendel's work did provide evidence for discrete hereditary units. That is precisely what the reappearance of the recessive trait in F₂ demonstrates — something particulate was passed on intact rather than being diluted away. He called them factors; we call them genes.
DiagramAnimatedThe recessive reappears intact, which is the evidence for particulate units.
Formula to userecessive reappears unchanged in F₂ → the units are PARTICULATE
Baby steps
I. Alleles do not blend — the recessive trait returns intact in F₂. Correct.
II. Alleles are alternative forms of the same gene, differing slightly. Correct.
III. Mendel's results are precisely the evidence that discrete hereditary units exist. Incorrect.
IV. The law of independent assortment states that different gene pairs segregate independently. Correct.
So I, II and IV.
Answer
I, II and IV only
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
I, II, IV
keep
The three genuine statements, with the planted one excluded.
I, II, III
rule out
Keeps III, which contradicts what Mendel's F₂ results actually showed.
I, III, IV
rule out
Keeps III and drops II, which is a correct definition of an allele.
II, III, IV
rule out
Keeps III and drops I — but non-blending is the single most important thing Mendel demonstrated.
Shortcut
In a set like this, look for the statement that contradicts the chapter's main result. The whole point of Mendel's work is that inheritance is particulate, so a statement saying his laws provided no evidence for genes is swimming against the entire chapter. Any option containing it can go.
Where it went wrong
Statement III was kept and statement I was dropped — and statement I, that alleles do not blend, is the central conclusion of the whole topic. It is worth noting that III has a grain of historical truth behind it, since Mendel never saw a chromosome and the physical basis came later. But “no proof for the existence of genes” goes much further than that, and the F₂ recovery of the recessive trait is exactly such proof. When a statement seems half-defensible, check it against the chapter's headline finding.
Q 39Left blankWhat dominance means
In a diploid organism, what does it mean when one allele is dominant over another?
The dominant allele produces a non-functional enzyme.
The dominant allele modifies the information contained in the recessive allele.
CorrectThe dominant allele's trait is expressed in the phenotype, even if only one copy is present.
The dominant allele is always less efficient than the recessive allele.
Given
A diploid organism carrying two alleles of a gene.
One allele is dominant over the other.
Asked
What dominance means.
Concept to use
Dominance is a statement about the phenotype of the heterozygote and nothing else. The dominant allele's trait shows up even when only one copy is present. The usual molecular reason is that the dominant allele makes a functional product, and one working copy is enough — while the recessive allele typically makes a non-functional or absent product, which is simply masked.
DiagramAnimatedDominance is a statement about what the heterozygote looks like.
Formula to useAa looks like AA → A is dominant
Baby steps
Take the heterozygote Aa. If it looks like AA, then A is dominant.
One functional copy is usually enough to produce the normal phenotype.
The alleles do not interact chemically — the recessive one is unchanged and still gets passed on intact, which is why it reappears in F₂.
So dominance means: the trait is expressed with only one copy present.
Answer
The dominant allele's trait is expressed in the phenotype, even if only one copy is present
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
produces a non-functional enzyme
rule out
This describes the recessive allele in most cases. The dominant one usually makes the working product.
modifies the information in the recessive allele
rule out
Alleles do not alter each other. The recessive allele is passed on completely unchanged — which is the whole basis of non-blending inheritance.
expressed with one copy present
keep
The definition of dominance, stated in terms of the heterozygote.
always less efficient than the recessive
rule out
The reverse is usually true, and the word always makes it worse.
Shortcut
Test each option against one question: what does the heterozygote look like? Only the correct option is actually about the heterozygote at all — the other three make claims about enzymes, interactions and efficiency. Dominance is defined by appearance, not by mechanism.
Q 45Attempted · correctTrue-breeding lines · two statements
Answered correctlyKept in because it belongs with Q10, Q15 and Q17 as part of the same cluster of questions about Mendel's method — and the other three on this paper were all missed. Reading the four together is worth more than reading them separately.
Statement I: Mendel used true breeding pea plants for his experiments. Statement II: A true-breeding line is obtained by continuous self-pollination in the plant.
Correct — and chosenBoth statement I and statement II are correct.
Both statement I and statement II are incorrect.
Statement I is correct, but statement II is incorrect.
Statement I is incorrect, but statement II is correct.
Given
Statement I about Mendel's use of true-breeding plants.
Statement II about how a true-breeding line is produced.
Asked
The truth of each statement.
Concept to use
A true-breeding line is one that produces offspring identical to itself for a trait, generation after generation — which requires it to be homozygous. Continued self-pollination is exactly how you get there: each round of selfing removes heterozygotes, until only homozygotes are left. Mendel began with such lines so that the parental genotypes were known with certainty.
DiagramAnimatedWhy true-breeding lines were available, and why they mattered.
Formula to useself-pollinate repeatedly → homozygous → true-breeding
Baby steps
Statement I. Mendel began every cross with true-breeding varieties, so he knew each parent's genotype exactly. Correct.
Statement II. Repeated self-pollination halves the proportion of heterozygotes each generation, driving the line towards homozygosity. Correct.
Both statements are correct.
This connects directly to Q15 on this paper: it is because peas naturally self-pollinate that true-breeding lines were available to him in the first place.
Answer
Both statement I and statement II are correct
Why this option and not the others
Option
Verdict
Reason
Both correct
keep
Mendel used true-breeding lines, and selfing is how such lines are made.
Both incorrect
rule out
Neither contains an error.
I correct, II incorrect
rule out
Statement II is the standard definition of how a true-breeding line arises.
I incorrect, II correct
rule out
Starting from true-breeding parents is the foundation of his entire method.
Shortcut
Statement-pair questions in this chapter are worth attempting whatever the time pressure — there is no calculation, and each statement can be judged on its own. Read them separately, decide true or false for each, and only then look at the options. Trying to hold both plus four option combinations at once is what makes them feel hard.
What the ten have in common
Reading the paper as a whole
Four questions, one block of facts
Q10, Q15, Q17 and Q45 all ask about Mendel's method, and three of the four were missed. They
are worth learning as one connected story rather than four separate items:
Fact
Why it mattered
Asked in
7 characters, 14 varieties
Each contrast needs two true-breeding lines.
10
True-breeding lines, made by selfing
So the parental genotypes were known
with certainty.
45
Pea: self-pollinating, contrasting traits, small, fast
Control, clear
data, big numbers, many generations.
15
Large samples + several generations
Rules out chance, and rules out a
one-off.
17
Notice how they interlock: peas self-pollinate (Q15), which is what makes true-breeding lines
available (Q45); they are small and fast-growing (Q15), which is what makes large samples across
generations possible (Q17). Learning the chain makes each individual fact retrievable.
Q13 repeats an error from the ILTS-05 paper
Q13 is a test cross, Tt × tt, and the 1 : 2 : 1 answer was chosen — which belongs
to Tt × Tt. The same substitution appeared as Q2 on the ILTS-05 paper, where 25% was
given for a cross whose answer is 50%.
The fix is one reading habit: read the second parent first. If it is homozygous, the
answer is a 1 : 1 split and one genotype is impossible. If it is heterozygous, you get 1 : 2 : 1.
And a faster check for this particular question: can a TT offspring exist at all? It needs
a T from each parent, and the dwarf parent has none — so any option showing TT is dead
immediately.
Three of the seven were “all of these” questions
Q15, Q25 and Q38 each list four items and ask which are correct. In Q15 and Q25 the answer was
all four, and in both cases one true item was dropped. In Q38 one false item was kept.
The habit that helps: try to disprove each item individually, rather than ranking them
by how important they feel. Q15's reason (c) — more plants in less space — sounds
minor, but it is exactly what produced the large sample size that Q17 identifies as the source of
Mendel's credibility. Nothing on these lists is filler.
Two notes on the archive
Q1 and Q162 (Chemistry) were cropped before their option lists, so the marked answers
are not visible. Both cards give the worked answer; check your own paper for what was
selected.
The archive contained repeated screenshots — the biology folder held each
question twice. These have been deduplicated, so the ten cards here are ten distinct
questions.