🏠 NEET Home

ILTS-04 · Biology · Error notes

Principles of Inheritance and Variation

One chapter, ten questions

Every biology question flagged on this paper, rebuilt in full. Each one carries what was given, what was asked, the concept behind it, the rule, the steps written out, a table justifying the right option and ruling out each of the others, the fastest route through, and an animated figure wherever seeing the thing settles the answer.

10Questions reviewed
7Attempted, wrong
1Left blank
1Attempted, correct

The shape of this paper

Ten questions: seven attempted and missed, one left blank, one answered correctly, and one (Q1) whose screenshot was cropped before the options.

The attempt rate is high — eight of the nine that show an answer were attempted. What this paper exposes is something narrower than a knowledge gap: four of the seven wrong answers are about Mendel's experimental method, and they form a single cluster that is much easier to learn together than separately.

Contents

Principles of Inheritance and Variation10 questions · 7 wrong · 1 blank
Q1Q5Q10Q13Q15Q17Q25Q38Q39Q45
Red = attempted and missed · Amber = left blank · Green = attempted and correct · Grey = marked answer not captured

Principles of Inheritance and Variation

7 wrong · 1 blank

Ten questions, and eight of them concern Mendel's method rather than his results — which plants he used, how many, over how many generations, and why any of that made his conclusions believable.

Q 1Marked answer not capturedMatch · basic genetic vocabulary
Marked answer not capturedThis screenshot was cropped below the table, so the option list and the selection are not visible. The worked matching is below; check your own paper for what was marked.

Match List I with List II.
A) Genes   I) Unit of inheritance
B) Homozygous   II) Genetic composition of an organism
C) Genotype   III) Physical appearance of an organism
D) Phenotype   IV) Recessive trait

  1. CorrectA–I, B–IV, C–II, D–III
Given
  • Four terms: genes, homozygous, genotype, phenotype.
  • Four descriptions to match them to.
Asked

The correct matching.

Concept to use

Three of the four are definitions you can place directly. A gene is the unit of inheritance. A genotype is the genetic make-up. A phenotype is the outward appearance. That leaves homozygous with the remaining item, and the link is that a recessive trait can only show when the individual is homozygous for it.

Diagram
Everything a Punnett square tells youitypes of GAMETESthe row and column headingsiiGENOTYPES of zygoteswhat is written in each boxiiigenotypes of F₁ and F₂run the square twiceivphenotypes of F₁ and F₂read the genotypes offAll four. The square is built FROM the gametes, so it necessarilyshows them — leaving (i) out is the usual slip.
AnimatedThe vocabulary of a cross, laid out where each term applies.
Formula to usegene = unit · genotype = what it IS · phenotype = what it LOOKS like
Baby steps
  1. A. Genes — Mendel's “factors”, the units passed from parent to offspring. A–I.
  2. C. Genotype — the alleles an organism carries, e.g. Tt. C–II.
  3. D. Phenotype — what you can see, e.g. tall. D–III.
  4. B. Homozygous takes the only item left, IV. The connection is real: a recessive trait appears only in the homozygous recessive condition. B–IV.
Answer
A–I, B–IV, C–II, D–III
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
A-I, B-IV, C-II, D-IIIkeepThree definitions place themselves, and the fourth follows by elimination with a genuine link behind it.
Shortcut
In a four-by-four match, place the obvious ones first and let the awkward pairing fall out by elimination. Genotype and phenotype are near-opposites and both appear here, so pinning those two immediately halves the work. The tricky item is never the one to start with.
Q 5Attempted · wrongWho developed the Punnett square

Punnett square was developed by

  1. Her answerBritish Zoologist, Reginald C. Punnett
  2. German Botanist, Reginald C. Punnett
  3. Stanford Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
  4. CorrectBritish Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
Given
  • Reginald C. Punnett, the originator of the Punnett square.
  • The four options differ only in his nationality and discipline.
Asked

The correct description of Punnett.

Concept to use

Every option carries the same name, so the question is entirely about two attributes: his nationality and his field. He was British, and he was a geneticist — a founder of modern genetics, and a collaborator of William Bateson, who coined the word “genetics”.

Diagram
Everything a Punnett square tells youitypes of GAMETESthe row and column headingsiiGENOTYPES of zygoteswhat is written in each boxiiigenotypes of F₁ and F₂run the square twiceivphenotypes of F₁ and F₂read the genotypes offAll four. The square is built FROM the gametes, so it necessarilyshows them — leaving (i) out is the usual slip.
AnimatedThe tool itself — and the field it belongs to.
Formula to useReginald C. Punnett — British GENETICIST
Baby steps
  1. Two options say British and two do not, so nationality halves the field.
  2. German is wrong, and Stanford is an American university, so those two go.
  3. Of the two British options, one says zoologist and one says geneticist.
  4. Punnett was a geneticist, so the last option is correct.
Answer
British Geneticist Reginald C. Punnett
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
British Zoologistrule outThe nationality is right but the discipline is not. Punnett worked on inheritance, not on animal biology generally.
German Botanistrule outWrong on both counts. The German botanist associated with the rediscovery of Mendel's work is Carl Correns.
Stanford Geneticistrule outThe discipline is right but he was British and worked at Cambridge, not Stanford.
British GeneticistkeepBoth attributes correct.
Shortcut
When every option shares a name, the question is a two-attribute check, so test one attribute at a time. Nationality first cuts the list in half in about two seconds, and only then do you need to know his field. Rushing straight at the whole phrase is what makes these feel like guesswork.
Where it went wrong
“British” was correct and “zoologist” was not. The two remaining options differ by a single word, which is the classic shape of this trap: the paper gets you to the last pair and then tests one specific fact. Given that Punnett squares belong to genetics, the discipline is recoverable from the topic itself — the tool tells you the field.
Q 10Attempted · wrongMendel's method · two statements

Statement I: Mendel selected 14 true breeding pea plant varieties, as pairs which were similar except for one character with contrasting traits.
Statement II: The Mendel experiments has a large sampling size which gave greater credibility to the data.

  1. CorrectBoth statement I and statement II are correct.
  2. Both statement I and statement II are incorrect.
  3. Statement I is correct, statement II is incorrect.
  4. Her answerStatement I is incorrect, statement II is correct.
Given
  • Statement I about the 14 varieties Mendel selected.
  • Statement II about his large sample size.
Asked

The truth of each statement.

Concept to use

Both statements are straight out of NCERT. Mendel studied seven contrasting characters, and each character needed two true-breeding varieties — one for each trait. Seven pairs is 14 varieties, which is exactly what statement I says. Statement II names one of the two things that made his conclusions trustworthy, the other being observation over several generations.

Diagram
Why the garden pea was the right choiceself-pollinating, but easyto cross-pollinate by handclear contrasting traitstall/dwarf, round/wrinkledsmall plant, big numbersmany plants in little spaceshort life cyclemany generations, quicklyAll four reasons are genuine, and NCERT lists all four.Add the two that made his CONCLUSIONS trustworthy: a largesample size, and confirmation over several generations.
AnimatedSeven characters, two varieties each, and thousands of plants.
Formula to use7 characters × 2 contrasting varieties each → 14 true-breeding lines
Baby steps
  1. Mendel worked with seven pairs of contrasting characters — tall/dwarf, round/wrinkled, and so on.
  2. Each pair needed two true-breeding lines, one showing each trait.
  3. 7 × 2 = 14 varieties. Statement I is correct.
  4. Statement II: Mendel counted thousands of plants, and that large sample is precisely what raised his work above anecdote. Correct.
  5. Both statements stand.
Answer
Both statement I and statement II are correct
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
Both correctkeep7 pairs of characters means 14 varieties, and the large sample size is the standard NCERT point about his credibility.
Both incorrectrule outNeither contains an error.
I correct, II incorrectrule outStatement II is the well-known reason his results were taken seriously.
I incorrect, II correctrule outStatement I is right — the number 14 comes from 7 characters × 2 varieties, and it is easy to mistake for an error if you are holding only the number 7.
Shortcut
The number to hold is 7 characters, 14 varieties. Both figures appear in questions and they are easy to confuse, but one is simply twice the other, and knowing why makes them impossible to mix up: you cannot show a contrast with only one line.
Where it went wrong
Statement I was rejected, almost certainly because the number 7 is the one most strongly attached to Mendel and 14 looked wrong. But 7 counts the characters and 14 counts the varieties, and both numbers are correct in their own context. When a familiar number appears in an unfamiliar form, the question to ask is counting what? rather than assuming an error.
Q 13Attempted · wrongTest cross · counting offspring

In pea plants, tallness (T) is dominant over dwarfness (t). When heterozygous tall plants (Tt) are crossed with homozygous recessive dwarf plants (tt), 100 offspring are produced. How many plants will be homozygous dwarf (tt), heterozygous tall (Tt), and homozygous tall (TT)?

  1. 0 homozygous dwarf, 100 heterozygous tall, 0 homozygous tall
  2. 100 homozygous dwarf, 0 heterozygous tall, 0 homozygous tall
  3. Her answer25 homozygous dwarf, 50 heterozygous tall, 25 homozygous tall
  4. Correct50 homozygous dwarf, 50 heterozygous tall, 0 homozygous tall
Given
  • Tt × tt, a test cross.
  • 100 offspring in total.
Asked

How many are tt, Tt and TT.

Concept to use

The dwarf parent is tt and can only ever give a t. So every single offspring receives a t from that side, and no offspring can possibly be TT — there is no second T available anywhere in the cross. The Tt parent supplies T or t equally, which splits the offspring evenly into Tt and tt.

Diagram
gametes from one parentTtttTtttTtttgametesfrom the otherTwo of four are tt and two are Tt. No box can be TT.
AnimatedTt × tt: the dwarf parent supplies only t, so TT is impossible.
Formula to useTt × tt → Tt : tt = 1 : 1 , TT = 0
Baby steps
  1. The tt parent produces only t gametes.
  2. The Tt parent produces T and t gametes in equal numbers.
  3. Combining: T × t gives Tt, and t × t gives tt.
  4. So the offspring are 50%% Tt and 50%% tt.
  5. Of 100 offspring: 50 tt, 50 Tt, and 0 TT. TT is impossible because only one parent carries a T at all.
Answer
50 homozygous dwarf, 50 heterozygous tall, 0 homozygous tall
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
0 dwarf, 100 Tt, 0 TTrule outWould require the dwarf parent to give a T, which it cannot — it is tt.
100 dwarf, 0 Tt, 0 TTrule outWould require the tall parent to give only t, ignoring half its gametes.
25 dwarf, 50 Tt, 25 TTrule outThis is the 1 : 2 : 1 result of Tt × Tt, a different cross. It also produces TT offspring, which this cross cannot.
50 dwarf, 50 Tt, 0 TTkeepA 1 : 1 split, with no TT possible because only one parent carries T.
Shortcut
Ask one question before anything else: can a TT offspring exist? It needs a T from each parent, and the dwarf parent has none. So any option showing TT offspring is dead immediately — which removes the main distractor here without a single calculation.
Where it went wrong
The 1 : 2 : 1 pattern was applied, and that belongs to Tt × Tt, not to Tt × tt. This is the same cross-confusion that appeared as Q2 on the ILTS-05 paper, where 25% was given for a test cross that should have been 50%. The distinguishing step is always to read the second parent first: if it is homozygous, the answer is a 1 : 1 split and one genotype is impossible; if it is heterozygous, you get 1 : 2 : 1.
Q 15Attempted · wrongWhy Mendel chose the pea plant

Mendel conducted artificial pollination/cross-pollination experiments using several true-breeding pea lines. Mendel chose the pea plant for his investigations for the following reasons:
a) A pea is naturally self-pollinating but can be easily cross-pollinated.
b) The characters in the garden pea plant are manifested as two opposing traits, e.g., tall or dwarf plants.
c) In less space, more plants can be grown.
d) Life span is short, hence many generations can be observed.

  1. a, b and c are only correct
  2. Her answera, b and d are only correct
  3. b, c and d are only correct
  4. Correcta, b, c and d are correct
Given
  • Four stated reasons for choosing the garden pea.
Asked

Which reasons are correct.

Concept to use

All four are genuine, and each solves a different practical problem. (a) gives control — self-pollination keeps lines pure, while hand cross-pollination lets him make the crosses he wants. (b) gives clear data — traits that are either one thing or the other, with no middle ground to argue about. (c) gives numbers — large samples in a small garden. (d) gives generations — results within a season rather than a lifetime.

Diagram
Why the garden pea was the right choiceself-pollinating, but easyto cross-pollinate by handclear contrasting traitstall/dwarf, round/wrinkledsmall plant, big numbersmany plants in little spaceshort life cyclemany generations, quicklyAll four reasons are genuine, and NCERT lists all four.Add the two that made his CONCLUSIONS trustworthy: a largesample size, and confirmation over several generations.
AnimatedFour practical reasons, each solving a different problem.
Formula to usecontrol (a) + clear traits (b) + large numbers (c) + fast generations (d)
Baby steps
  1. (a) Peas self-pollinate naturally, which maintains true-breeding lines without effort, and the flower structure still allows deliberate crossing. Correct.
  2. (b) Seven characters each appear in two sharply distinct forms — no blending, no judgement calls. Correct.
  3. (c) A small plant means many individuals in a monastery garden, which is what made his large sample possible. Correct.
  4. (d) A short life cycle meant he could follow F₁, F₂ and beyond within a few years. Correct.
  5. All four stand.
Answer
a, b, c and d are correct
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
a, b, c onlyrule outDrops (d), but the short life cycle is one of the most frequently cited reasons of all.
a, b, d onlyrule outDrops (c). Growing many plants in a small space is what produced the large sample size that Q10 on this same paper praises.
b, c, d onlyrule outDrops (a), which is arguably the single most important reason — without controllable pollination there is no experiment at all.
a, b, c and dkeepEvery one of the four is a standard NCERT reason.
Shortcut
When a stem lists four plausible reasons and offers “all of them” as an option, check whether any one can actually be disproved rather than merely looking less important. Here none can. NCERT lists all four, and “all of the above” is the right answer far more often in this chapter than instinct suggests.
Where it went wrong
Reason (c) was dropped, presumably as the least memorable of the four. But it is doing real work: a small plant is what allowed thousands of individuals to be grown and counted, and that large sample is exactly what Q10 and Q17 on this same paper identify as the source of Mendel's credibility. Three questions on this paper turn on the same cluster of facts about his method, so it is worth learning as one block rather than as separate items.
Q 17Attempted · wrongWhy Mendel's results were believed

Which of the following approaches by Mendel helps to prove that his results pointed to general rules of inheritance rather than being unsubstantiated ideas?

  1. use of large sample size in experiments
  2. confirmation of his inferences from experiments on successive generations
  3. Her answerstatistical analysis and mathematical logic were applied
  4. Correctlarge sampling size and several generations of observation
Given
  • Four candidate features of Mendel's approach.
Asked

Which approach established his results as general rules.

Concept to use

Two things together made his results convincing, and NCERT names them as a pair: a large sample size, which rules out coincidence, and observation over several generations, which shows the pattern repeats rather than being a one-off. Either alone is weaker than both together, and the option list is built so that one option contains both.

Diagram
Why the garden pea was the right choiceself-pollinating, but easyto cross-pollinate by handclear contrasting traitstall/dwarf, round/wrinkledsmall plant, big numbersmany plants in little spaceshort life cyclemany generations, quicklyAll four reasons are genuine, and NCERT lists all four.Add the two that made his CONCLUSIONS trustworthy: a largesample size, and confirmation over several generations.
AnimatedLarge samples and repeated generations — the two together.
Formula to uselarge samples (rules out chance) + several generations (rules out a one-off)
Baby steps
  1. A large sample means the ratios are statistically reliable rather than accidental.
  2. Repeating across generations shows the same ratios reappear predictably.
  3. Options 1 and 2 each name one of these, so each is true but incomplete.
  4. Option 4 names both, and is therefore the fullest answer.
  5. Option 3 mentions statistical analysis, which Mendel did use — but it is a consequence of having large samples, not the approach itself, and it is not the phrase NCERT uses here.
Answer
Large sampling size and several generations of observation
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
large sample sizerule outTrue, but only half of the pair. A large sample in a single generation could still be a fluke of that one cross.
confirmation over successive generationsrule outAlso true, and also only half.
statistical analysis and mathematical logicrule outHe did keep careful counts, but this describes his handling of the data rather than the design of the experiments, and it is not the NCERT wording.
large sampling size and several generationskeepBoth halves together, which is exactly how NCERT states it.
Shortcut
When two options are each individually true and a third option combines them, the combined option is nearly always intended. Scan the list for overlap before choosing, because a question asking what made results convincing is asking for the full case, not one strand of it.
Where it went wrong
“Statistical analysis and mathematical logic” sounds like the most rigorous option, and rigour is what the question seems to be asking about — which is exactly why it is offered. But the two features NCERT names are the sample size and the repetition across generations, and one option contains both. Noticing that options 1 and 2 are each halves of option 4 would have pointed straight at it.
Q 25Attempted · wrongWhat a Punnett square shows

Which of the following can be understood/identified using a Punnett square?
i) Types of gametes produced from parental genotype
ii) Genotypes of zygotes formed
iii) Genotypes of F₁ and F₂ generations
iv) Phenotypes of F₁ and F₂ generations

  1. (i), (ii) and (iii) only
  2. (ii), (iii) and (iv) only
  3. Her answer(i), (iii) and (iv) only
  4. Correct(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
Given
  • Four things a Punnett square might show.
Asked

Which of them it can show.

Concept to use

A Punnett square is built from the gametes — they are the row and column headings — and the boxes inside are the genotypes of the zygotes. So (i) and (ii) are not merely visible in it, they are its two structural halves. Run the square a second time on the F₁ and you get the F₂ genotypes too, and reading dominance off those genotypes gives the phenotypes. All four.

Diagram
Everything a Punnett square tells youitypes of GAMETESthe row and column headingsiiGENOTYPES of zygoteswhat is written in each boxiiigenotypes of F₁ and F₂run the square twiceivphenotypes of F₁ and F₂read the genotypes offAll four. The square is built FROM the gametes, so it necessarilyshows them — leaving (i) out is the usual slip.
AnimatedEverything the square contains, by construction.
Formula to useheadings = gametes · boxes = genotypes · dominance = phenotypes
Baby steps
  1. (i) The headings along the top and side are the gamete types. You cannot draw the square without identifying them. Yes.
  2. (ii) Each box holds the genotype of a possible zygote. That is what the square is for. Yes.
  3. (iii) One square gives F₁; selfing the F₁ and drawing a second square gives F₂. Yes.
  4. (iv) Apply the dominance relationship to each genotype and the phenotypes follow immediately. Yes.
  5. All four.
Answer
(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
(i), (ii), (iii)rule outDrops phenotypes, but they are read straight off the genotypes.
(ii), (iii), (iv)rule outDrops the gametes, which are literally the headings of the square.
(i), (iii), (iv)rule outDrops the genotypes of the zygotes — the contents of every box. This is the least defensible omission of the three.
(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)keepThe square contains all four, by construction.
Shortcut
Picture the square itself and point at each item: the headings are the gametes, the boxes are the genotypes, running it twice gives F₂, and dominance converts genotypes to phenotypes. If you can point at it on the diagram, it belongs in the answer — and here you can point at all four.
Where it went wrong
Item (ii), the genotypes of the zygotes, was dropped — and that is the one thing the square most obviously does, since the genotypes are written inside the boxes. It looks like (ii) and (iii) were read as saying the same thing, with one of them discarded as redundant. They are not the same: (ii) is about zygotes in general and (iii) is about specific generations. In an “all of these” question, treat each item on its own merits rather than looking for overlap.
Q 38Attempted · wrongStatements about alleles and genes

Choose the correct statement.
I) Alleles do not blend with each other.
II) Alleles are units of inheritance and slightly different from the same genes.
III) Mendel's laws did not provide any proof for the existence of genes.
IV) Genes are independent pairs segregated independent of each other.

  1. CorrectI, II, and IV only
  2. I, II, and III only
  3. I, III, and IV only
  4. Her answerII, III, and IV only
Given
  • Four statements about alleles, genes and Mendel's laws.
Asked

Which statements are correct.

Concept to use

Statements I, II and IV are all standard. Statement III is the planted one: Mendel's work did provide evidence for discrete hereditary units. That is precisely what the reappearance of the recessive trait in F₂ demonstrates — something particulate was passed on intact rather than being diluted away. He called them factors; we call them genes.

Diagram
gametes from one parentTtTtTTTtTtttgametesfrom the othertt returns unchanged in F₂ — nothing blended.
AnimatedThe recessive reappears intact, which is the evidence for particulate units.
Formula to userecessive reappears unchanged in F₂ → the units are PARTICULATE
Baby steps
  1. I. Alleles do not blend — the recessive trait returns intact in F₂. Correct.
  2. II. Alleles are alternative forms of the same gene, differing slightly. Correct.
  3. III. Mendel's results are precisely the evidence that discrete hereditary units exist. Incorrect.
  4. IV. The law of independent assortment states that different gene pairs segregate independently. Correct.
  5. So I, II and IV.
Answer
I, II and IV only
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
I, II, IVkeepThe three genuine statements, with the planted one excluded.
I, II, IIIrule outKeeps III, which contradicts what Mendel's F₂ results actually showed.
I, III, IVrule outKeeps III and drops II, which is a correct definition of an allele.
II, III, IVrule outKeeps III and drops I — but non-blending is the single most important thing Mendel demonstrated.
Shortcut
In a set like this, look for the statement that contradicts the chapter's main result. The whole point of Mendel's work is that inheritance is particulate, so a statement saying his laws provided no evidence for genes is swimming against the entire chapter. Any option containing it can go.
Where it went wrong
Statement III was kept and statement I was dropped — and statement I, that alleles do not blend, is the central conclusion of the whole topic. It is worth noting that III has a grain of historical truth behind it, since Mendel never saw a chromosome and the physical basis came later. But “no proof for the existence of genes” goes much further than that, and the F₂ recovery of the recessive trait is exactly such proof. When a statement seems half-defensible, check it against the chapter's headline finding.
Q 39Left blankWhat dominance means

In a diploid organism, what does it mean when one allele is dominant over another?

  1. The dominant allele produces a non-functional enzyme.
  2. The dominant allele modifies the information contained in the recessive allele.
  3. CorrectThe dominant allele's trait is expressed in the phenotype, even if only one copy is present.
  4. The dominant allele is always less efficient than the recessive allele.
Given
  • A diploid organism carrying two alleles of a gene.
  • One allele is dominant over the other.
Asked

What dominance means.

Concept to use

Dominance is a statement about the phenotype of the heterozygote and nothing else. The dominant allele's trait shows up even when only one copy is present. The usual molecular reason is that the dominant allele makes a functional product, and one working copy is enough — while the recessive allele typically makes a non-functional or absent product, which is simply masked.

Diagram
Three ways a heterozygote can lookCOMPLETERR × rrF₁ = Rrlooks like ONE parentINCOMPLETERR × rrF₁ = Rra BLEND — in betweenCO-DOMINANCEIᵀIᵀ × IᴿIᴿF₁ = IᵀIᴿBOTH shown, side by sideA BLEND means incomplete dominance. BOTH parental traits appearingseparately in the same individual means co-dominance. They are not the same.
AnimatedDominance is a statement about what the heterozygote looks like.
Formula to useAa looks like AA → A is dominant
Baby steps
  1. Take the heterozygote Aa. If it looks like AA, then A is dominant.
  2. One functional copy is usually enough to produce the normal phenotype.
  3. The alleles do not interact chemically — the recessive one is unchanged and still gets passed on intact, which is why it reappears in F₂.
  4. So dominance means: the trait is expressed with only one copy present.
Answer
The dominant allele's trait is expressed in the phenotype, even if only one copy is present
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
produces a non-functional enzymerule outThis describes the recessive allele in most cases. The dominant one usually makes the working product.
modifies the information in the recessive allelerule outAlleles do not alter each other. The recessive allele is passed on completely unchanged — which is the whole basis of non-blending inheritance.
expressed with one copy presentkeepThe definition of dominance, stated in terms of the heterozygote.
always less efficient than the recessiverule outThe reverse is usually true, and the word always makes it worse.
Shortcut
Test each option against one question: what does the heterozygote look like? Only the correct option is actually about the heterozygote at all — the other three make claims about enzymes, interactions and efficiency. Dominance is defined by appearance, not by mechanism.
Q 45Attempted · correctTrue-breeding lines · two statements
Answered correctlyKept in because it belongs with Q10, Q15 and Q17 as part of the same cluster of questions about Mendel's method — and the other three on this paper were all missed. Reading the four together is worth more than reading them separately.

Statement I: Mendel used true breeding pea plants for his experiments.
Statement II: A true-breeding line is obtained by continuous self-pollination in the plant.

  1. Correct — and chosenBoth statement I and statement II are correct.
  2. Both statement I and statement II are incorrect.
  3. Statement I is correct, but statement II is incorrect.
  4. Statement I is incorrect, but statement II is correct.
Given
  • Statement I about Mendel's use of true-breeding plants.
  • Statement II about how a true-breeding line is produced.
Asked

The truth of each statement.

Concept to use

A true-breeding line is one that produces offspring identical to itself for a trait, generation after generation — which requires it to be homozygous. Continued self-pollination is exactly how you get there: each round of selfing removes heterozygotes, until only homozygotes are left. Mendel began with such lines so that the parental genotypes were known with certainty.

Diagram
Why the garden pea was the right choiceself-pollinating, but easyto cross-pollinate by handclear contrasting traitstall/dwarf, round/wrinkledsmall plant, big numbersmany plants in little spaceshort life cyclemany generations, quicklyAll four reasons are genuine, and NCERT lists all four.Add the two that made his CONCLUSIONS trustworthy: a largesample size, and confirmation over several generations.
AnimatedWhy true-breeding lines were available, and why they mattered.
Formula to useself-pollinate repeatedly → homozygous → true-breeding
Baby steps
  1. Statement I. Mendel began every cross with true-breeding varieties, so he knew each parent's genotype exactly. Correct.
  2. Statement II. Repeated self-pollination halves the proportion of heterozygotes each generation, driving the line towards homozygosity. Correct.
  3. Both statements are correct.
  4. This connects directly to Q15 on this paper: it is because peas naturally self-pollinate that true-breeding lines were available to him in the first place.
Answer
Both statement I and statement II are correct
Why this option and not the others
OptionVerdictReason
Both correctkeepMendel used true-breeding lines, and selfing is how such lines are made.
Both incorrectrule outNeither contains an error.
I correct, II incorrectrule outStatement II is the standard definition of how a true-breeding line arises.
I incorrect, II correctrule outStarting from true-breeding parents is the foundation of his entire method.
Shortcut
Statement-pair questions in this chapter are worth attempting whatever the time pressure — there is no calculation, and each statement can be judged on its own. Read them separately, decide true or false for each, and only then look at the options. Trying to hold both plus four option combinations at once is what makes them feel hard.

What the ten have in common

Reading the paper as a whole

Four questions, one block of facts

Q10, Q15, Q17 and Q45 all ask about Mendel's method, and three of the four were missed. They are worth learning as one connected story rather than four separate items:

FactWhy it matteredAsked in
7 characters, 14 varietiesEach contrast needs two true-breeding lines. 10
True-breeding lines, made by selfingSo the parental genotypes were known with certainty.45
Pea: self-pollinating, contrasting traits, small, fastControl, clear data, big numbers, many generations.15
Large samples + several generationsRules out chance, and rules out a one-off.17

Notice how they interlock: peas self-pollinate (Q15), which is what makes true-breeding lines available (Q45); they are small and fast-growing (Q15), which is what makes large samples across generations possible (Q17). Learning the chain makes each individual fact retrievable.

Q13 repeats an error from the ILTS-05 paper

Q13 is a test cross, Tt × tt, and the 1 : 2 : 1 answer was chosen — which belongs to Tt × Tt. The same substitution appeared as Q2 on the ILTS-05 paper, where 25% was given for a cross whose answer is 50%.

The fix is one reading habit: read the second parent first. If it is homozygous, the answer is a 1 : 1 split and one genotype is impossible. If it is heterozygous, you get 1 : 2 : 1. And a faster check for this particular question: can a TT offspring exist at all? It needs a T from each parent, and the dwarf parent has none — so any option showing TT is dead immediately.

Three of the seven were “all of these” questions

Q15, Q25 and Q38 each list four items and ask which are correct. In Q15 and Q25 the answer was all four, and in both cases one true item was dropped. In Q38 one false item was kept.

The habit that helps: try to disprove each item individually, rather than ranking them by how important they feel. Q15's reason (c) — more plants in less space — sounds minor, but it is exactly what produced the large sample size that Q17 identifies as the source of Mendel's credibility. Nothing on these lists is filler.

Two notes on the archive